[{"_1":2,"_3":-5,"_4":-5},"loaderData",{"_5":6,"_7":8,"_9":10},"actionData","errors","root",{"_156":157,"_158":159},"routes/_app.x.$handle.$name",{"_95":94,"_32":45,"_104":85,"_27":105,"_13":14,"_106":-5,"_11":107,"_108":109,"_110":111,"_112":113,"_114":115,"_20":-5,"_116":-5,"_117":-5,"_118":25,"_119":120,"_121":122,"_123":-5,"_124":-5,"_125":126},"routes/_app.x.$handle.$name.branch.$branch.version.$version.diff",{"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":-5,"_18":-5},"project",{"_43":44,"_32":45,"_38":46,"_47":-5,"_48":25,"_49":50,"_51":50,"_52":53,"_54":-5,"_18":55,"_56":-5,"_57":25,"_58":-5,"_59":-5,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":-5,"_65":-5,"_66":-5,"_67":-5,"_68":69,"_70":69,"_71":72,"_73":72,"_74":72,"_75":69,"_76":69,"_77":78,"_79":80,"_81":82,"_83":25},"version",22,"changes",[19],"aiChatInfo","userId",{"_20":21,"_22":23,"_24":25,"_26":25,"_27":28,"_29":28},"file",{"_30":31,"_32":28,"_33":34,"_35":37,"_38":39,"_40":14,"_41":42,"_24":25},"previous",{"_30":31,"_32":28,"_33":34,"_35":36},"deleted",false,"deletedHere","path","Morbau_proxy.ts","latestPath","fileId","59365ba0-68b9-11f1-8041-1607ee4eb77e","name","fileType","http","content","/**\n * Morbau – Claude AI Proxy\n * Val Town (Deno) version\n *\n * Custom-flow scoring is fully dynamic and UNBIASED:\n * 1. The competitor is scored BLIND (ingredients only, no name, no comparison)\n * with the exact rubric shown to the visitor in the theme.\n * 2. Morbau is scored with the SAME blind call (cached per locale, since its\n * INCI never changes) — nothing about Morbau is hard-coded in our favour.\n * 3. A SEPARATE comparative call writes the verdict. It receives both score\n * sets but is instructed not to alter them.\n *\n * Response shape (new):\n * {\n * morbau: { scores: {...8}, notes: {...8} },\n * competitor: { scores: {...8}, notes: {...8} },\n * verdictPoints: [\"...\",\"...\",\"...\"],\n * summary: \"...\"\n * }\n *\n * Environment variables:\n * ANTHROPIC_API_KEY – Anthropic API key\n * ALLOWED_ORIGIN – e.g. https://morbau.se\n */\n\nimport { blob } from \"https://esm.town/v/std/blob\";\n\nconst MODEL = \"claude-sonnet-4-6\";\nconst EFFORT = \"medium\"; // low | medium | high — controls reasoning depth / cost on Sonnet 4.6\nconst MAX_TOKENS = 1200;\nconst RATE_LIMIT = 5;\nconst MAX_INGREDIENTS = 2000;\n\n/** Bump when the rubric changes — invalidates the cached Morbau scores. */\nconst RUBRIC_VERSION = \"v6\";\n\nconst CRITERIA = [\"remin\",\"karies\",\"whitening\",\"ilningar\",\"tandsten\",\"tandkott\",\"andedrakt\",\"formel\"];\n\nconst MORBAU = \"Calcium Hydroxyapatite, Sodium Fluoride, Potassium Nitrate, Charcoal Powder, Hydrated Silica, Calcium Peroxide, Zinc Acetate, Phthalimidoperoxycaproic Acid (PAP), Sodium Hyaluronate, Xanthan Gum, Sorbitol, Glycerin, Menthol, Mentha Arvensis Leaf Oil, Erythritol, Phthalimidohexanoic Acid, Aqua, Sodium C12-18 Alkyl Sulfate, Sodium Saccharin, Sodium Benzoate, Citric Acid, Monosodium Citrate, PVM/MA Copolymer, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Dicalcium Phosphate, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Limonene\";\n\nconst LANG: Record = {\n sv: \"Swedish\", de: \"German\", nl: \"Dutch\", da: \"Danish\",\n};\n\n/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n * BLIND SCORING PROMPT\n * No product name, no competitor, no Morbau reference. This is the text the\n * theme displays to the visitor — keep the two in sync.\n * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\nconst SCORE_SYSTEM = `You are an independent toothpaste formulation expert. Score a product's ingredient list on eight criteria using ONLY the absolute anchors below. Score the ingredients on their own merits — do not compare against any other product, and do not assume which product the list belongs to. Output integers only.\n\nGLOBAL SCORING PRINCIPLES (apply to every criterion):\n- Score on the established clinical evidence for the ingredient classes listed, in their established functional role.\n- Number of ingredients is never itself a merit. A single agent with strong established evidence can reach the upper scores. Additional agents raise a score ONLY when they add a distinct, independently-evidenced mechanism — not when they duplicate a mechanism already counted (e.g. two pyrophosphates, or two fluoride salts, count as one mechanism).\n- Weigh agents by EVIDENCE TIER, not count. For caries specifically: agents with direct caries-endpoint evidence (effective-level fluoride, hydroxyapatite) are PRIMARY; polyols with established anticaries evidence (erythritol, xylitol), arginine, and CPP-ACP are ADJUNCTIVE — they complement but never replace a primary; sorbitol, plain calcium/phosphate salts, zinc salts, anti-tartar copolymers and pyrophosphates are WEAK/indirect for caries and do not move the caries score on their own (their evidenced roles are scored under tartar / gum / breath). The same primary/adjunctive/weak tiering governs tartar control (see \\`tandsten\\`): condensed phosphates, zinc salts and copolymers are primary; citrate is adjunctive; abrasives are weak/non-qualifying. Apply these tiers identically to every product.\n- Use concentrations ONLY when stated on the label. Never fabricate or assume an unstated amount, and do not treat an unstated amount as either high or low. Where a concentration IS stated and an effective range is well established (e.g. fluoride ~1000–1500 ppm), you may use it.\n- Standard fluoride salts (sodium fluoride, sodium monofluorophosphate, stannous fluoride, amine fluoride) are comparably effective for CARIES at equal fluoride concentration. Do not rank them against each other on caries efficacy alone. Stannous fluoride's additional antibacterial, desensitizing, and gum roles count under THOSE criteria, not as superior caries efficacy.\n- Fluoride and hydroxyapatite are both established PRIMARY anticaries agents and are scored equivalently when each is present as a primary agent. Do not rank fluoride and hydroxyapatite against each other on caries efficacy.\n\nFunctional reference (classify ingredients by their established role; this does not by itself assign any score):\n- Anti-tartar copolymers: PVM/MA copolymer (a.k.a. polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid copolymer, methoxyethylene/maleic acid copolymer, or Gantrez) is an established anti-tartar/anti-calculus agent — a distinct mechanism alongside zinc salts and pyrophosphates. It has no standalone caries mechanism.\n- Condensed phosphates (anti-tartar): pyrophosphates (tetrasodium/tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, calcium pyrophosphate) and equivalent polyphosphates (e.g. sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate) inhibit calculus crystal growth — ONE distinct anti-tartar mechanism regardless of how many such salts are listed. NOTE: plain dicalcium phosphate (DCP) is an abrasive/polishing agent, NOT an anti-tartar agent.\n- Citrate salts (sodium citrate, monosodium/potassium citrate; citric acid as buffer pair): an ADJUNCTIVE anti-tartar agent (calcium chelation) with secondary evidence — reinforces but does not equal or replace a primary anti-tartar mechanism; primarily a pH adjuster.\n- Abrasives / polishing agents (hydrated silica, charcoal, dicalcium phosphate): remove soft plaque mechanically only — they are NOT chemical anti-calculus agents and do not move the tartar score on their own.\n- Zinc salts: zinc acetate, zinc citrate, zinc chloride, zinc lactate act as anti-tartar, gum-supporting, and antibacterial agents. Their caries-specific evidence is weak; they do not by themselves move the caries score.\n- Stannous fluoride is simultaneously an anticaries fluoride, a desensitizing agent, a gum-health agent, and an antibacterial agent.\n- Hydroxyapatite (incl. calcium hydroxyapatite, nano-hydroxyapatite) is a remineralizing agent and occludes dentin tubules (sensitivity relief). It is an established (PRIMARY) anticaries agent, scored on equal footing with fluoride in its established remineralizing/anticaries role; standard fluoride salts and hydroxyapatite are not ranked against each other on caries efficacy when each is present as a primary agent.\n- Anticaries polyols: erythritol and xylitol have established (secondary) evidence for reducing cariogenic bacteria (esp. S. mutans), plaque, and caries incidence; erythritol's evidence is somewhat stronger than xylitol's, and both are stronger than sorbitol. They are ADJUNCTIVE anticaries agents. Sorbitol is non-cariogenic but at most a weak anticaries adjunct and does not move the caries score on its own.\n- Arginine: an ADJUNCTIVE anticaries agent (raises plaque pH via arginolytic bacteria), typically used alongside fluoride or calcium carbonate.\n- CPP-ACP (casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate): a bioavailable calcium-phosphate remineralization/anticaries ADJUNCT; distinct from plain calcium or phosphate salts (e.g. dicalcium phosphate), which have only weak standalone caries evidence.\n- Sodium hyaluronate / hyaluronic acid is a gum-soothing, gum-supporting agent.\n- Potassium nitrate is an established desensitizing agent (nerve depolarization).\n- Whitening actives: PAP (phthalimidoperoxycaproic acid), hydrogen peroxide, calcium peroxide, carbamide peroxide are active (chemical) whitening agents; abrasive silica/charcoal provide mechanical polishing only.\n- Antibacterials: zinc salts, stannous fluoride, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine. Menthol/mint and other aromas are flavoring, not antibacterial.\n\nremin (remineralization):\n1=no remineralizing agent; 2=only weak/limited-evidence agents (calcium or phosphate salts without fluoride); 3=one established remineralizing agent present (fluoride, or hydroxyapatite); 4=a primary remineralizing system with strong evidence (effective-level fluoride, or hydroxyapatite); 5=two or more genuinely complementary, independently-evidenced mechanisms (e.g. fluoride + hydroxyapatite). Same-mechanism duplication does not qualify for 5.\n\nkaries (cavity prevention):\nClassify each caries-relevant ingredient by evidence tier (apply identically to every product):\n- PRIMARY: effective-level fluoride (any standard salt) and hydroxyapatite. Both are established primary anticaries agents and are scored equivalently in their primary role; do not rank fluoride and hydroxyapatite against each other on caries efficacy when each is present as a primary agent.\n- ADJUNCTIVE: consistent but secondary caries evidence, acting via a mechanism distinct from remineralization (reducing acidogenic bacteria / non-fermentable substrate / pH buffering) — erythritol, xylitol and other established anticaries polyols, arginine, and CPP-ACP. These complement a primary agent but never replace one.\n- WEAK / NON-QUALIFYING for caries: sorbitol, plain calcium/phosphate salts (e.g. dicalcium phosphate as abrasive), zinc salts, anti-tartar copolymers (PVM/MA), pyrophosphates. These do NOT move the caries score on their own.\n\n1=no primary and no adjunctive anticaries agent.\n2=no primary agent, but one or more adjunctive agents present as the only caries-relevant ingredients (e.g. erythritol, xylitol, arginine, or CPP-ACP on their own).\n3=solid standard protection from a single primary route: one primary agent present — effective-level fluoride (any standard salt) OR hydroxyapatite — with no second independently-evidenced mechanism.\n4=one primary agent PLUS a second independently-evidenced mechanism: two primaries (fluoride + hydroxyapatite), OR one primary agent (effective-level fluoride OR hydroxyapatite) + a consistently-evidenced adjunctive agent (e.g. erythritol).\n5=two complementary independently-evidenced primary mechanisms both at effective levels (e.g. effective-level fluoride + hydroxyapatite). Adjunctive agents, however many, never lift a single-primary formula to 5.\n\nwhitening:\n1=no whitening function; 2=mechanical polishing only (basic abrasive silica); 3=an enhanced mechanical polishing/stain-removal system; 4=one evidence-backed active (chemical) whitening agent (e.g. PAP or a peroxide); 5=an active whitening system with strong established evidence, or complementary active whitening mechanisms combined. Two weak agents do not reach 5.\n\nilningar (sensitivity relief):\n1=none; 2=one mild/limited-evidence agent (e.g. arginine); 3=one established agent (potassium nitrate, stannous fluoride, or tubule-occluding hydroxyapatite); 4=an established agent plus a second agent acting via a DIFFERENT mechanism (nerve depolarization vs tubule occlusion); 5=agents combining both principal mechanisms (nerve + occlusion) with supporting evidence.\n\ntandsten (tartar control):\nRecognized PRIMARY anti-tartar mechanisms (each distinct, established): (i) condensed phosphates — pyrophosphates and equivalent polyphosphates (multiple such salts still count as ONE mechanism); (ii) zinc salts; (iii) anti-tartar copolymers (PVM/MA, Gantrez). ADJUNCTIVE: citrate salts (calcium chelation) reinforce a primary but never count as a distinct primary mechanism and never replace one. WEAK / NON-QUALIFYING: abrasives/polishing agents (hydrated silica, charcoal, dicalcium phosphate) give only mechanical plaque removal and do not move this score on their own.\n1=no anti-tartar agent (primary or adjunctive); only abrasives, or none.\n2=one primary anti-tartar mechanism present (a condensed phosphate, a zinc salt, OR a copolymer); OR — absent any primary — one or more adjunctive agents (e.g. citrate) as the only anti-tartar-relevant ingredients.\n3=a well-established primary anti-tartar agent functioning as the primary system (optionally reinforced by an adjunctive citrate).\n4=two primary mechanisms acting by DISTINCT routes (e.g. pyrophosphate + zinc, copolymer + zinc, or copolymer + pyrophosphate).\n5=three distinct primary mechanisms combined (condensed phosphate + zinc + copolymer). Multiple agents of the same class count as one mechanism; adjunctive and abrasive agents never substitute for a distinct primary mechanism.\n\ntandkott (gum health):\n1=none; 2=a basic/general antibacterial only (e.g. menthol); 3=one targeted, evidence-backed gum-health agent (stannous fluoride, zinc, or chlorhexidine); 4=two targeted agents acting via distinct mechanisms; 5=three or more complementary gum-health agents (e.g. stannous fluoride + zinc + hyaluronic acid).\n\nandedrakt (breath / antibacterial):\n1=no antibacterial or freshening agent; 2=flavoring only (menthol/mint); 3=one evidence-backed antibacterial agent (zinc, stannous fluoride, CPC, triclosan); 4=one antibacterial agent plus a flavoring system; 5=two or more antibacterial agents acting by distinct mechanisms plus a flavoring system.\n\nformel (formula quality): holistic but anchored — judge the formula as a whole, NOT as an average of the other seven. Assess (a) how many oral-care functions are credibly covered by evidence-backed actives, (b) the strength and consistency of evidence for those actives, (c) appropriate use of actives, including correct dosing where stated and no redundancy presented as added benefit, and (d) absence of formulation concerns. Do NOT credit novelty or ingredient count for their own sake: a focused, well-evidenced, well-dosed formula can score 5, and a long list of weakly-evidenced or duplicative actives should not.\n1=minimal or poorly-evidenced formula; 2=basic function covered, limited evidence; 3=solid evidence-based coverage of core functions; 4=broad, well-evidenced coverage across several functions, soundly formulated; 5=comprehensive, strongly-evidenced, well-constructed formula with no significant redundancy or gaps.`;\n\nfunction buildScorePrompt(ingredients: string, lang: string): string {\n return `Score this product's ingredient list on the absolute rubric in your instructions.\n\nIngredients: ${ingredients}\n\nAlso write \"notes\": a neutral, factual comment of max 8 words per criterion describing what this product's ingredients do (or lack) for that criterion. Do not mention or imply any other product.\n\nWrite all \"notes\" text in ${lang}.\n\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no explanation):\n{\"remin\":<1-5>,\"karies\":<1-5>,\"whitening\":<1-5>,\"ilningar\":<1-5>,\"tandsten\":<1-5>,\"tandkott\":<1-5>,\"andedrakt\":<1-5>,\"formel\":<1-5>,\"notes\":{\"remin\":\"...\",\"karies\":\"...\",\"whitening\":\"...\",\"ilningar\":\"...\",\"tandsten\":\"...\",\"tandkott\":\"...\",\"andedrakt\":\"...\",\"formel\":\"...\"}}`;\n}\n\n/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n * COMPARATIVE VERDICT PROMPT\n * Openly comparative. Receives both score sets; must NOT change them.\n * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\nconst VERDICT_SYSTEM = `You are an independent dental-care analyst writing a short, balanced comparison of two toothpastes. Their scores were assigned independently and blindly on an absolute 1-5 rubric — treat them as fixed and do not re-score. Be even-handed: name genuine strengths of BOTH products and base every claim on the listed ingredients and the given scores. State which product offers more across the eight categories ONLY if the scores support it; if the competitor leads, or the two are close, say so plainly.`;\n\nfunction buildVerdictPrompt(\n compName: string,\n compIngredients: string,\n morbauScores: Record,\n compScores: Record,\n lang: string,\n): string {\n return `Product A — Morbau\nIngredients: ${MORBAU}\nScores: ${JSON.stringify(morbauScores)}\n\nProduct B — ${compName}\nIngredients: ${compIngredients}\nScores: ${JSON.stringify(compScores)}\n\nWrite 3-4 short bullet points weighing both products honestly, and a 2-3 sentence summary stating the overall conclusion across all eight categories. Write all text in ${lang}.\n\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no markdown):\n{\"verdictPoints\":[\"...\",\"...\",\"...\"],\"summary\":\"...\"}`;\n}\n\n/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\n\nasync function callClaude(apiKey: string, system: string, prompt: string): Promise> {\n const res = await fetch(\"https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages\", {\n method: \"POST\",\n headers: {\n \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\",\n \"x-api-key\": apiKey,\n \"anthropic-version\": \"2023-06-01\",\n },\n body: JSON.stringify({\n model: MODEL,\n max_tokens: MAX_TOKENS,\n output_config: { effort: EFFORT },\n system,\n messages: [{ role: \"user\", content: prompt }],\n }),\n });\n if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`anthropic ${res.status}`);\n const data = await res.json();\n const blocks = Array.isArray(data?.content) ? data.content : [];\n const text = blocks.find((b: { type?: string }) => b?.type === \"text\")?.text ?? \"\";\n return JSON.parse(text.replace(/```json\\s*|```\\s*/g, \"\").trim());\n}\n\n/** Clamp + integer-coerce the eight scores; default to 3 on garbage. */\nfunction cleanScores(parsed: Record): Record {\n const scores: Record = {};\n for (const k of CRITERIA) {\n const raw = Number(parsed[k]);\n scores[k] = Math.min(5, Math.max(1, Math.round(isNaN(raw) ? 3 : raw)));\n }\n return scores;\n}\n\nfunction cleanNotes(parsed: Record): Record {\n const src = (parsed.notes && typeof parsed.notes === \"object\")\n ? parsed.notes as Record\n : {};\n const notes: Record = {};\n for (const k of CRITERIA) notes[k] = typeof src[k] === \"string\" ? src[k] as string : \"\";\n return notes;\n}\n\n/** Score Morbau once per locale and cache it — its INCI is constant. */\nasync function getMorbauScored(apiKey: string, lang: string, locale: string) {\n const cacheKey = `mbc_morbau_${RUBRIC_VERSION}_${locale}`;\n try {\n const cached = await blob.getJSON(cacheKey);\n if (cached && (cached as any).scores) return cached as { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n } catch { /* miss */ }\n\n const parsed = await callClaude(apiKey, SCORE_SYSTEM, buildScorePrompt(MORBAU, lang));\n const result = { scores: cleanScores(parsed), notes: cleanNotes(parsed) };\n try { await blob.setJSON(cacheKey, result); } catch { /* non-fatal */ }\n return result;\n}\n\nexport default async function handler(req: Request): Promise {\n const origin = Deno.env.get(\"ALLOWED_ORIGIN\") ?? \"*\";\n\n if (req.method === \"OPTIONS\") {\n return new Response(null, { headers: {\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin,\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Methods\": \"POST, OPTIONS\",\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Headers\": \"Content-Type\",\n }});\n }\n if (req.method !== \"POST\") return err(\"Method not allowed\", 405, origin);\n\n // Rate limiting (per IP per day)\n const ip = req.headers.get(\"x-forwarded-for\")?.split(\",\")[0].trim() ?? \"unknown\";\n const key = `mbc_${new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)}_${ip}`;\n let count = 0;\n try { const s = await blob.getJSON(key); count = typeof s === \"number\" ? s : 0; } catch {}\n if (count >= RATE_LIMIT) return err(\"Rate limit reached\", 429, origin);\n\n // Parse body\n let body: { name?: string; ingredients?: string; locale?: string };\n try { body = await req.json(); } catch { return err(\"Invalid JSON\", 400, origin); }\n\n const { name = \"Competitor\", ingredients = \"\", locale = \"en\" } = body;\n if (!ingredients || ingredients.length < 10) return err(\"Too short\", 400, origin);\n if (ingredients.length > MAX_INGREDIENTS) return err(\"Too long\", 400, origin);\n\n const apiKey = Deno.env.get(\"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY\");\n if (!apiKey) return err(\"API key not configured\", 500, origin);\n\n const lang = LANG[locale] ?? \"English\";\n const safeName = name.slice(0, 80);\n\n // 1 + 2: blind-score competitor and Morbau in parallel (Morbau usually cached)\n let competitor: { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n let morbau: { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n try {\n const [compParsed, morbauScored] = await Promise.all([\n callClaude(apiKey, SCORE_SYSTEM, buildScorePrompt(ingredients, lang)),\n getMorbauScored(apiKey, lang, locale),\n ]);\n competitor = { scores: cleanScores(compParsed), notes: cleanNotes(compParsed) };\n morbau = morbauScored;\n } catch {\n return err(\"Scoring failed\", 502, origin);\n }\n\n // 3: comparative verdict (does not touch scores). Degrade gracefully.\n let verdictPoints: string[] = [];\n let summary = \"\";\n try {\n const v = await callClaude(\n apiKey,\n VERDICT_SYSTEM,\n buildVerdictPrompt(safeName, ingredients, morbau.scores, competitor.scores, lang),\n );\n if (Array.isArray(v.verdictPoints)) verdictPoints = (v.verdictPoints as unknown[]).map(String).slice(0, 5);\n if (typeof v.summary === \"string\") summary = v.summary;\n } catch { /* verdict optional — stars still render */ }\n\n try { await blob.setJSON(key, count + 1); } catch {}\n\n return new Response(JSON.stringify({ morbau, competitor, verdictPoints, summary }), {\n status: 200,\n headers: { \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\", \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin },\n });\n}\n\nfunction err(msg: string, status: number, origin: string): Response {\n return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: msg }), {\n status,\n headers: { \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\", \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin },\n });\n}","/**\n * Morbau – Claude AI Proxy\n * Val Town (Deno) version\n *\n * Custom-flow scoring is fully dynamic and UNBIASED:\n * 1. The competitor is scored BLIND (ingredients only, no name, no comparison)\n * with the exact rubric shown to the visitor in the theme.\n * 2. Morbau is scored with the SAME blind call (cached per locale, since its\n * INCI never changes) — nothing about Morbau is hard-coded in our favour.\n * 3. A SEPARATE comparative call writes the verdict. It receives both score\n * sets but is instructed not to alter them.\n *\n * Response shape (new):\n * {\n * morbau: { scores: {...8}, notes: {...8} },\n * competitor: { scores: {...8}, notes: {...8} },\n * verdictPoints: [\"...\",\"...\",\"...\"],\n * summary: \"...\"\n * }\n *\n * Environment variables:\n * ANTHROPIC_API_KEY – Anthropic API key\n * ALLOWED_ORIGIN – e.g. https://morbau.se\n */\n\nimport { blob } from \"https://esm.town/v/std/blob\";\n\nconst MODEL = \"claude-sonnet-4-6\";\nconst EFFORT = \"medium\"; // low | medium | high — controls reasoning depth / cost on Sonnet 4.6\nconst MAX_TOKENS = 1200;\nconst RATE_LIMIT = 10;\nconst MAX_INGREDIENTS = 2000;\n\n/** Bump when the rubric changes — invalidates the cached Morbau scores. */\nconst RUBRIC_VERSION = \"v6\";\n\nconst CRITERIA = [\"remin\",\"karies\",\"whitening\",\"ilningar\",\"tandsten\",\"tandkott\",\"andedrakt\",\"formel\"];\n\nconst MORBAU = \"Calcium Hydroxyapatite, Sodium Fluoride, Potassium Nitrate, Charcoal Powder, Hydrated Silica, Calcium Peroxide, Zinc Acetate, Phthalimidoperoxycaproic Acid (PAP), Sodium Hyaluronate, Xanthan Gum, Sorbitol, Glycerin, Menthol, Mentha Arvensis Leaf Oil, Erythritol, Phthalimidohexanoic Acid, Aqua, Sodium C12-18 Alkyl Sulfate, Sodium Saccharin, Sodium Benzoate, Citric Acid, Monosodium Citrate, PVM/MA Copolymer, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Dicalcium Phosphate, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Limonene\";\n\nconst LANG: Record = {\n sv: \"Swedish\", de: \"German\", nl: \"Dutch\", da: \"Danish\",\n};\n\n/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n * BLIND SCORING PROMPT\n * No product name, no competitor, no Morbau reference. This is the text the\n * theme displays to the visitor — keep the two in sync.\n * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\nconst SCORE_SYSTEM = `You are an independent toothpaste formulation expert. Score a product's ingredient list on eight criteria using ONLY the absolute anchors below. Score the ingredients on their own merits — do not compare against any other product, and do not assume which product the list belongs to. Output integers only.\n\nGLOBAL SCORING PRINCIPLES (apply to every criterion):\n- Score on the established clinical evidence for the ingredient classes listed, in their established functional role.\n- Number of ingredients is never itself a merit. A single agent with strong established evidence can reach the upper scores. Additional agents raise a score ONLY when they add a distinct, independently-evidenced mechanism — not when they duplicate a mechanism already counted (e.g. two pyrophosphates, or two fluoride salts, count as one mechanism).\n- Weigh agents by EVIDENCE TIER, not count. For caries specifically: agents with direct caries-endpoint evidence (effective-level fluoride, hydroxyapatite) are PRIMARY; polyols with established anticaries evidence (erythritol, xylitol), arginine, and CPP-ACP are ADJUNCTIVE — they complement but never replace a primary; sorbitol, plain calcium/phosphate salts, zinc salts, anti-tartar copolymers and pyrophosphates are WEAK/indirect for caries and do not move the caries score on their own (their evidenced roles are scored under tartar / gum / breath). The same primary/adjunctive/weak tiering governs tartar control (see \\`tandsten\\`): condensed phosphates, zinc salts and copolymers are primary; citrate is adjunctive; abrasives are weak/non-qualifying. Apply these tiers identically to every product.\n- Use concentrations ONLY when stated on the label. Never fabricate or assume an unstated amount, and do not treat an unstated amount as either high or low. Where a concentration IS stated and an effective range is well established (e.g. fluoride ~1000–1500 ppm), you may use it.\n- Standard fluoride salts (sodium fluoride, sodium monofluorophosphate, stannous fluoride, amine fluoride) are comparably effective for CARIES at equal fluoride concentration. Do not rank them against each other on caries efficacy alone. Stannous fluoride's additional antibacterial, desensitizing, and gum roles count under THOSE criteria, not as superior caries efficacy.\n- Fluoride and hydroxyapatite are both established PRIMARY anticaries agents and are scored equivalently when each is present as a primary agent. Do not rank fluoride and hydroxyapatite against each other on caries efficacy.\n\nFunctional reference (classify ingredients by their established role; this does not by itself assign any score):\n- Anti-tartar copolymers: PVM/MA copolymer (a.k.a. polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid copolymer, methoxyethylene/maleic acid copolymer, or Gantrez) is an established anti-tartar/anti-calculus agent — a distinct mechanism alongside zinc salts and pyrophosphates. It has no standalone caries mechanism.\n- Condensed phosphates (anti-tartar): pyrophosphates (tetrasodium/tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, calcium pyrophosphate) and equivalent polyphosphates (e.g. sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate) inhibit calculus crystal growth — ONE distinct anti-tartar mechanism regardless of how many such salts are listed. NOTE: plain dicalcium phosphate (DCP) is an abrasive/polishing agent, NOT an anti-tartar agent.\n- Citrate salts (sodium citrate, monosodium/potassium citrate; citric acid as buffer pair): an ADJUNCTIVE anti-tartar agent (calcium chelation) with secondary evidence — reinforces but does not equal or replace a primary anti-tartar mechanism; primarily a pH adjuster.\n- Abrasives / polishing agents (hydrated silica, charcoal, dicalcium phosphate): remove soft plaque mechanically only — they are NOT chemical anti-calculus agents and do not move the tartar score on their own.\n- Zinc salts: zinc acetate, zinc citrate, zinc chloride, zinc lactate act as anti-tartar, gum-supporting, and antibacterial agents. Their caries-specific evidence is weak; they do not by themselves move the caries score.\n- Stannous fluoride is simultaneously an anticaries fluoride, a desensitizing agent, a gum-health agent, and an antibacterial agent.\n- Hydroxyapatite (incl. calcium hydroxyapatite, nano-hydroxyapatite) is a remineralizing agent and occludes dentin tubules (sensitivity relief). It is an established (PRIMARY) anticaries agent, scored on equal footing with fluoride in its established remineralizing/anticaries role; standard fluoride salts and hydroxyapatite are not ranked against each other on caries efficacy when each is present as a primary agent.\n- Anticaries polyols: erythritol and xylitol have established (secondary) evidence for reducing cariogenic bacteria (esp. S. mutans), plaque, and caries incidence; erythritol's evidence is somewhat stronger than xylitol's, and both are stronger than sorbitol. They are ADJUNCTIVE anticaries agents. Sorbitol is non-cariogenic but at most a weak anticaries adjunct and does not move the caries score on its own.\n- Arginine: an ADJUNCTIVE anticaries agent (raises plaque pH via arginolytic bacteria), typically used alongside fluoride or calcium carbonate.\n- CPP-ACP (casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate): a bioavailable calcium-phosphate remineralization/anticaries ADJUNCT; distinct from plain calcium or phosphate salts (e.g. dicalcium phosphate), which have only weak standalone caries evidence.\n- Sodium hyaluronate / hyaluronic acid is a gum-soothing, gum-supporting agent.\n- Potassium nitrate is an established desensitizing agent (nerve depolarization).\n- Whitening actives: PAP (phthalimidoperoxycaproic acid), hydrogen peroxide, calcium peroxide, carbamide peroxide are active (chemical) whitening agents; abrasive silica/charcoal provide mechanical polishing only.\n- Antibacterials: zinc salts, stannous fluoride, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine. Menthol/mint and other aromas are flavoring, not antibacterial.\n\nremin (remineralization):\n1=no remineralizing agent; 2=only weak/limited-evidence agents (calcium or phosphate salts without fluoride); 3=one established remineralizing agent present (fluoride, or hydroxyapatite); 4=a primary remineralizing system with strong evidence (effective-level fluoride, or hydroxyapatite); 5=two or more genuinely complementary, independently-evidenced mechanisms (e.g. fluoride + hydroxyapatite). Same-mechanism duplication does not qualify for 5.\n\nkaries (cavity prevention):\nClassify each caries-relevant ingredient by evidence tier (apply identically to every product):\n- PRIMARY: effective-level fluoride (any standard salt) and hydroxyapatite. Both are established primary anticaries agents and are scored equivalently in their primary role; do not rank fluoride and hydroxyapatite against each other on caries efficacy when each is present as a primary agent.\n- ADJUNCTIVE: consistent but secondary caries evidence, acting via a mechanism distinct from remineralization (reducing acidogenic bacteria / non-fermentable substrate / pH buffering) — erythritol, xylitol and other established anticaries polyols, arginine, and CPP-ACP. These complement a primary agent but never replace one.\n- WEAK / NON-QUALIFYING for caries: sorbitol, plain calcium/phosphate salts (e.g. dicalcium phosphate as abrasive), zinc salts, anti-tartar copolymers (PVM/MA), pyrophosphates. These do NOT move the caries score on their own.\n\n1=no primary and no adjunctive anticaries agent.\n2=no primary agent, but one or more adjunctive agents present as the only caries-relevant ingredients (e.g. erythritol, xylitol, arginine, or CPP-ACP on their own).\n3=solid standard protection from a single primary route: one primary agent present — effective-level fluoride (any standard salt) OR hydroxyapatite — with no second independently-evidenced mechanism.\n4=one primary agent PLUS a second independently-evidenced mechanism: two primaries (fluoride + hydroxyapatite), OR one primary agent (effective-level fluoride OR hydroxyapatite) + a consistently-evidenced adjunctive agent (e.g. erythritol).\n5=two complementary independently-evidenced primary mechanisms both at effective levels (e.g. effective-level fluoride + hydroxyapatite). Adjunctive agents, however many, never lift a single-primary formula to 5.\n\nwhitening:\n1=no whitening function; 2=mechanical polishing only (basic abrasive silica); 3=an enhanced mechanical polishing/stain-removal system; 4=one evidence-backed active (chemical) whitening agent (e.g. PAP or a peroxide); 5=an active whitening system with strong established evidence, or complementary active whitening mechanisms combined. Two weak agents do not reach 5.\n\nilningar (sensitivity relief):\n1=none; 2=one mild/limited-evidence agent (e.g. arginine); 3=one established agent (potassium nitrate, stannous fluoride, or tubule-occluding hydroxyapatite); 4=an established agent plus a second agent acting via a DIFFERENT mechanism (nerve depolarization vs tubule occlusion); 5=agents combining both principal mechanisms (nerve + occlusion) with supporting evidence.\n\ntandsten (tartar control):\nRecognized PRIMARY anti-tartar mechanisms (each distinct, established): (i) condensed phosphates — pyrophosphates and equivalent polyphosphates (multiple such salts still count as ONE mechanism); (ii) zinc salts; (iii) anti-tartar copolymers (PVM/MA, Gantrez). ADJUNCTIVE: citrate salts (calcium chelation) reinforce a primary but never count as a distinct primary mechanism and never replace one. WEAK / NON-QUALIFYING: abrasives/polishing agents (hydrated silica, charcoal, dicalcium phosphate) give only mechanical plaque removal and do not move this score on their own.\n1=no anti-tartar agent (primary or adjunctive); only abrasives, or none.\n2=one primary anti-tartar mechanism present (a condensed phosphate, a zinc salt, OR a copolymer); OR — absent any primary — one or more adjunctive agents (e.g. citrate) as the only anti-tartar-relevant ingredients.\n3=a well-established primary anti-tartar agent functioning as the primary system (optionally reinforced by an adjunctive citrate).\n4=two primary mechanisms acting by DISTINCT routes (e.g. pyrophosphate + zinc, copolymer + zinc, or copolymer + pyrophosphate).\n5=three distinct primary mechanisms combined (condensed phosphate + zinc + copolymer). Multiple agents of the same class count as one mechanism; adjunctive and abrasive agents never substitute for a distinct primary mechanism.\n\ntandkott (gum health):\n1=none; 2=a basic/general antibacterial only (e.g. menthol); 3=one targeted, evidence-backed gum-health agent (stannous fluoride, zinc, or chlorhexidine); 4=two targeted agents acting via distinct mechanisms; 5=three or more complementary gum-health agents (e.g. stannous fluoride + zinc + hyaluronic acid).\n\nandedrakt (breath / antibacterial):\n1=no antibacterial or freshening agent; 2=flavoring only (menthol/mint); 3=one evidence-backed antibacterial agent (zinc, stannous fluoride, CPC, triclosan); 4=one antibacterial agent plus a flavoring system; 5=two or more antibacterial agents acting by distinct mechanisms plus a flavoring system.\n\nformel (formula quality): holistic but anchored — judge the formula as a whole, NOT as an average of the other seven. Assess (a) how many oral-care functions are credibly covered by evidence-backed actives, (b) the strength and consistency of evidence for those actives, (c) appropriate use of actives, including correct dosing where stated and no redundancy presented as added benefit, and (d) absence of formulation concerns. Do NOT credit novelty or ingredient count for their own sake: a focused, well-evidenced, well-dosed formula can score 5, and a long list of weakly-evidenced or duplicative actives should not.\n1=minimal or poorly-evidenced formula; 2=basic function covered, limited evidence; 3=solid evidence-based coverage of core functions; 4=broad, well-evidenced coverage across several functions, soundly formulated; 5=comprehensive, strongly-evidenced, well-constructed formula with no significant redundancy or gaps.`;\n\nfunction buildScorePrompt(ingredients: string, lang: string): string {\n return `Score this product's ingredient list on the absolute rubric in your instructions.\n\nIngredients: ${ingredients}\n\nAlso write \"notes\": a neutral, factual comment of max 8 words per criterion describing what this product's ingredients do (or lack) for that criterion. Do not mention or imply any other product.\n\nWrite all \"notes\" text in ${lang}.\n\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no explanation):\n{\"remin\":<1-5>,\"karies\":<1-5>,\"whitening\":<1-5>,\"ilningar\":<1-5>,\"tandsten\":<1-5>,\"tandkott\":<1-5>,\"andedrakt\":<1-5>,\"formel\":<1-5>,\"notes\":{\"remin\":\"...\",\"karies\":\"...\",\"whitening\":\"...\",\"ilningar\":\"...\",\"tandsten\":\"...\",\"tandkott\":\"...\",\"andedrakt\":\"...\",\"formel\":\"...\"}}`;\n}\n\n/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n * COMPARATIVE VERDICT PROMPT\n * Openly comparative. Receives both score sets; must NOT change them.\n * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\nconst VERDICT_SYSTEM = `You are an independent dental-care analyst writing a short, balanced comparison of two toothpastes. Their scores were assigned independently and blindly on an absolute 1-5 rubric — treat them as fixed and do not re-score. Be even-handed: name genuine strengths of BOTH products and base every claim on the listed ingredients and the given scores. State which product offers more across the eight categories ONLY if the scores support it; if the competitor leads, or the two are close, say so plainly.`;\n\nfunction buildVerdictPrompt(\n compName: string,\n compIngredients: string,\n morbauScores: Record,\n compScores: Record,\n lang: string,\n): string {\n return `Product A — Morbau\nIngredients: ${MORBAU}\nScores: ${JSON.stringify(morbauScores)}\n\nProduct B — ${compName}\nIngredients: ${compIngredients}\nScores: ${JSON.stringify(compScores)}\n\nWrite 3-4 short bullet points weighing both products honestly, and a 2-3 sentence summary stating the overall conclusion across all eight categories. Write all text in ${lang}.\n\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no markdown):\n{\"verdictPoints\":[\"...\",\"...\",\"...\"],\"summary\":\"...\"}`;\n}\n\n/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */\n\nasync function callClaude(apiKey: string, system: string, prompt: string): Promise> {\n const res = await fetch(\"https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages\", {\n method: \"POST\",\n headers: {\n \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\",\n \"x-api-key\": apiKey,\n \"anthropic-version\": \"2023-06-01\",\n },\n body: JSON.stringify({\n model: MODEL,\n max_tokens: MAX_TOKENS,\n output_config: { effort: EFFORT },\n system,\n messages: [{ role: \"user\", content: prompt }],\n }),\n });\n if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`anthropic ${res.status}`);\n const data = await res.json();\n const blocks = Array.isArray(data?.content) ? data.content : [];\n const text = blocks.find((b: { type?: string }) => b?.type === \"text\")?.text ?? \"\";\n return JSON.parse(text.replace(/```json\\s*|```\\s*/g, \"\").trim());\n}\n\n/** Clamp + integer-coerce the eight scores; default to 3 on garbage. */\nfunction cleanScores(parsed: Record): Record {\n const scores: Record = {};\n for (const k of CRITERIA) {\n const raw = Number(parsed[k]);\n scores[k] = Math.min(5, Math.max(1, Math.round(isNaN(raw) ? 3 : raw)));\n }\n return scores;\n}\n\nfunction cleanNotes(parsed: Record): Record {\n const src = (parsed.notes && typeof parsed.notes === \"object\")\n ? parsed.notes as Record\n : {};\n const notes: Record = {};\n for (const k of CRITERIA) notes[k] = typeof src[k] === \"string\" ? src[k] as string : \"\";\n return notes;\n}\n\n/** Score Morbau once per locale and cache it — its INCI is constant. */\nasync function getMorbauScored(apiKey: string, lang: string, locale: string) {\n const cacheKey = `mbc_morbau_${RUBRIC_VERSION}_${locale}`;\n try {\n const cached = await blob.getJSON(cacheKey);\n if (cached && (cached as any).scores) return cached as { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n } catch { /* miss */ }\n\n const parsed = await callClaude(apiKey, SCORE_SYSTEM, buildScorePrompt(MORBAU, lang));\n const result = { scores: cleanScores(parsed), notes: cleanNotes(parsed) };\n try { await blob.setJSON(cacheKey, result); } catch { /* non-fatal */ }\n return result;\n}\n\nexport default async function handler(req: Request): Promise {\n const origin = Deno.env.get(\"ALLOWED_ORIGIN\") ?? \"*\";\n\n if (req.method === \"OPTIONS\") {\n return new Response(null, { headers: {\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin,\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Methods\": \"POST, OPTIONS\",\n \"Access-Control-Allow-Headers\": \"Content-Type\",\n }});\n }\n if (req.method !== \"POST\") return err(\"Method not allowed\", 405, origin);\n\n // Rate limiting (per IP per day)\n const ip = req.headers.get(\"x-forwarded-for\")?.split(\",\")[0].trim() ?? \"unknown\";\n const key = `mbc_${new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)}_${ip}`;\n let count = 0;\n try { const s = await blob.getJSON(key); count = typeof s === \"number\" ? s : 0; } catch {}\n if (count >= RATE_LIMIT) return err(\"Rate limit reached\", 429, origin);\n\n // Parse body\n let body: { name?: string; ingredients?: string; locale?: string };\n try { body = await req.json(); } catch { return err(\"Invalid JSON\", 400, origin); }\n\n const { name = \"Competitor\", ingredients = \"\", locale = \"en\" } = body;\n if (!ingredients || ingredients.length < 10) return err(\"Too short\", 400, origin);\n if (ingredients.length > MAX_INGREDIENTS) return err(\"Too long\", 400, origin);\n\n const apiKey = Deno.env.get(\"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY\");\n if (!apiKey) return err(\"API key not configured\", 500, origin);\n\n const lang = LANG[locale] ?? \"English\";\n const safeName = name.slice(0, 80);\n\n // 1 + 2: blind-score competitor and Morbau in parallel (Morbau usually cached)\n let competitor: { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n let morbau: { scores: Record; notes: Record };\n try {\n const [compParsed, morbauScored] = await Promise.all([\n callClaude(apiKey, SCORE_SYSTEM, buildScorePrompt(ingredients, lang)),\n getMorbauScored(apiKey, lang, locale),\n ]);\n competitor = { scores: cleanScores(compParsed), notes: cleanNotes(compParsed) };\n morbau = morbauScored;\n } catch {\n return err(\"Scoring failed\", 502, origin);\n }\n\n // 3: comparative verdict (does not touch scores). Degrade gracefully.\n let verdictPoints: string[] = [];\n let summary = \"\";\n try {\n const v = await callClaude(\n apiKey,\n VERDICT_SYSTEM,\n buildVerdictPrompt(safeName, ingredients, morbau.scores, competitor.scores, lang),\n );\n if (Array.isArray(v.verdictPoints)) verdictPoints = (v.verdictPoints as unknown[]).map(String).slice(0, 5);\n if (typeof v.summary === \"string\") summary = v.summary;\n } catch { /* verdict optional — stars still render */ }\n\n try { await blob.setJSON(key, count + 1); } catch {}\n\n return new Response(JSON.stringify({ morbau, competitor, verdictPoints, summary }), {\n status: 200,\n headers: { \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\", \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin },\n });\n}\n\nfunction err(msg: string, status: number, origin: string): Response {\n return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: msg }), {\n status,\n headers: { \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\", \"Access-Control-Allow-Origin\": origin },\n });\n}","createdAt",["D",1782137824512],"branchVersion","branchId","afb8631c-4ac9-4f51-90cf-9b3de25de054","id","2a00f289-e13a-4775-8212-ca2c5b7a8d28","morbau_proxy",["D",1781528069999],"deletedAt","legacyEnvVars","privacy","public","httpPrivacy","description","Morbau toothpaste","imageUrl","ac31039a-d9bb-492f-9301-5a07b8edcd0a","pinnedFileId","pinPreview","pinMigrated","screenshotVersion","likeCount",0,"orgId","019ecb56-6a2f-729e-add7-36fda18ceb0d","tursoName","tursoHostname","tursoMeasuredAt","pinned","userPerm","r","valPerm","blobPerm","rw","emailPerm","sqlitePerm","projectPerm","telemetryPerm","user",{"_95":94,"_103":99},"org",{"_95":94,"_96":97,"_98":99,"_18":55,"_100":101,"_102":25},"branch",{"_13":84,"_32":85,"_43":42,"_86":44,"_87":-5,"_88":-5,"_89":-5,"_90":-5,"_91":-5,"_92":45,"_93":94},"isOwned",25,"main","projectId","forkedBranchId","forkedBranchVersion","forkedProjectPrivacy","forkedProjectId","forkedProjectOrgId","projectName","userHandle","Morbau","handle","displayName","Vidar Sjöqvist","avatar","https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/ACg8ocJqAE1OCOvrDT6kM8CwE7ZimW0u2dVgwLxZIGTEi5YjYAsg-A=s96-c","tier","free","canRestrictVals","profileImageUrl","branchName","","adoptOrgId",{"_43":44,"_32":45,"_38":152,"_47":-5,"_48":25,"_49":50,"_51":50,"_52":53,"_54":-5,"_18":55,"_56":-5,"_57":25,"_58":-5,"_59":-5,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":-5,"_65":-5,"_66":-5,"_67":-5,"_68":69,"_70":69,"_71":72,"_73":72,"_74":72,"_75":69,"_76":69,"_77":153,"_79":154,"_81":155,"_83":25},"tree",[147],"files",[147],"counts",{"_135":61,"_136":137,"_138":61,"_139":140,"_141":142},"contents",[127],"upstreamProject","upstreamBranch","emptyEnvVars","flags",[],"hasHttpFiles",true,"grants","orgs","customDomains",{},{"_43":128,"_32":28,"_30":31,"_129":-5,"_41":42,"_40":14,"_130":25,"_38":131,"_13":132,"_33":34,"_35":37,"_24":25,"_133":-5,"_27":134},"f748a59c-51ce-40e2-82ea-8d22ecb9d0ab","parentId","latest",["D",1782137824512],21,"label",[28],"pulls","branches",1,"forks","envVars",{"_143":145,"_146":61},"connections",{"_143":61,"_144":61},"count","unfilledCount",2,"emptyCount",{"_43":128,"_32":28,"_30":31,"_129":-5,"_41":42,"_40":14,"_130":25,"_38":148,"_13":132,"_33":34,"_35":37,"_24":25,"_133":-5,"_149":150,"_27":151},["D",1782137824512],"children",[],[28],["D",1781528069999],{"_95":94,"_103":99},{"_95":94,"_96":97,"_98":99,"_18":55,"_100":101,"_102":25},{"_13":84,"_32":85,"_43":42,"_86":44,"_87":-5,"_88":-5,"_89":-5,"_90":-5,"_91":-5,"_92":45,"_93":94},"ctx",{"_77":-5,"_124":189,"_190":191,"_192":193,"_194":25,"_195":25,"_196":25,"_197":122,"_198":-5,"_199":-7,"_200":-7,"_201":61,"_202":25,"_203":25,"_204":-5,"_205":25,"_206":25,"_207":25,"_208":-5},"ENV",{"_160":161,"_162":163,"_164":85,"_165":166,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":172,"_173":174,"_175":176,"_177":178,"_179":180,"_181":182,"_183":184,"_185":186,"_187":188},"REACT_APP_SENTRY_DSN","https://586020d86f05489db63a554690acf1e9@o1398359.ingest.sentry.io/6724499","RENDER_GIT_COMMIT","e87eb04e707cf64e7e532c8e8ec395f209e17f15","RENDER_GIT_BRANCH","POSTHOG_API_TOKEN","phc_nmoyuAkStEZuUp69rYlg1DZgrIt19Gx0Y4Hwf8tGgJP","POSTHOG_API_HOST","https://wart.val.town","WEB_API_TEMPLATE","https://{val}.web.val.run","APP_URL","https://www.val.town","MODULE_URL","https://esm.town","VANITY_WEB_API_TEMPLATE","https://{label}.val.run/","DENOLS_URL","https://lsp.val.town","NODE_ENV","production","CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY","0x4AAAAAACtaIZJH7s9rBMZ6","GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID","875989696899-jtsqkhlbdv5jrlsk8631p7ipjg3c6o62.apps.googleusercontent.com","STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY","pk_live_51N2zvWEpZTTLipIkVEwXrUG9AT0yeOOEYxszarZT1jpsZV58Ly6wlg3SltZpHN26CUalOBmUSY7adQRQiSkCZz2500qSXNkf8Y","API_URL","https://api.val.town",[],"preferencesKeybindings","default","preferencesTheme","light","preferencesFixers","preferencesCopilot","preferencesSelectionAi","preferencesCloseBrackets","preferencesChatPanelState","preferencesDprint","preferencesDenofmt","notificationCount","flagDenols","isBusinessOrgMember","businessOrgHandle","isBusinessOrgAdmin","isHigherTownieTier","navCollapsed","currentOrgId"]

Diff · v22