[{"_1":2,"_3":-5,"_4":-5},"loaderData",{"_5":6,"_7":8},"actionData","errors","root",{"_107":108,"_109":110},"routes/embed.x.$handle.$name.$",{"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22},"handle","amir5","name","dogsspot_puppy_path","path","SOURCE-BUNDLE.part32.txt","project",{"_23":45,"_11":12,"_34":46,"_47":-5,"_48":42,"_49":50,"_51":50,"_52":53,"_54":-5,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":33,"_60":-5,"_61":-5,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":-5,"_73":74,"_75":74,"_76":77,"_78":77,"_79":77,"_80":74,"_81":74,"_82":83,"_84":85,"_86":87,"_88":42},"file",{"_23":24,"_11":14,"_25":26,"_27":-5,"_28":29,"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":17,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":-5,"_13":44},"permalink","https://www.val.town/x/amir5/dogsspot_puppy_path/code/SOURCE-BUNDLE.part32.txt","extension","txt","id","1e65e845-c781-4ded-b85f-3a4b25349d2e","fileId","895f80c6-97ea-11f1-8f32-1607ee4eb77e","parentId","branchId","551774fb-a850-4c9d-94a1-d3509ddcf1b0","branchVersion",1202,"latest",true,"createdAt",["D",1786982933596],"version",6,"fileType","content","THE DOGS SPOT — SOURCE BUNDLE (part 32 of 47)\n\nEVERY source file in this project, engine/ included. Restoring these parts and nothing else gives\nyou a tree that builds, typechecks and runs its own test suite with no network and no val.\n\nengine/ is here as of 14 Aug 2026. It used to be left out because val 1bfa6e81-74e1-4c6c-ab32-118304a4ffff\nholds it, which was true of every engine file except engine/watch.ts: a module the val does not run,\nso it was never deployed, so it lived in one container and nothing else. A reclaim destroyed it.\nscripts/deploy.mjs --check still compares engine/ against the val file by file; that is a second\ncheck on the same files now, not the only copy of them.\n\nRESTORE (needs only node, from an empty folder). Save each part, then run this ON EACH ONE:\n\n node -e 'const fs=require(\"fs\"),p=require(\"path\");const b=fs.readFileSync(process.argv[1],\"utf8\");\n for(const s of b.split(\"\\n=====FILE \").slice(1)){const i=s.indexOf(\" =====\\n\");\n const f=s.slice(0,i),c=s.slice(i+7);fs.mkdirSync(p.dirname(f),{recursive:true});\n fs.writeFileSync(f,c.replace(/\\n$/,\"\"))}' PART.txt\n\nA record named #1, #2, ... is one FILE cut into pieces: concatenate them in order, then\nstrip one trailing newline from the last. scripts/restore.mjs does this for you.\n\nEach part is complete in itself: whole files only, no reassembly, any order.\n\nThen: node scripts/build.mjs (engine/ came out of these parts; nothing to fetch first)\n node scripts/typecheck.mjs\n node tests/run-all.mjs\n node scripts/deploy.mjs --check (pulls nothing, proves the val matches what you restored)\n node tests/negative-controls.mjs (proves the suite above can actually fail)\n\nIN THIS PART (3 of 129 files)\n tests/wiring.test.mjs 38367 bytes b3a409b5e85a\n scripts/blueprint.py 19292 bytes 965b5a5582d8\n scripts/build.mjs 4894 bytes 2adde512c9b9\n\n================================================================================================\n=====FILE tests/wiring.test.mjs =====\n// THE WIRING. v1.0, 14 Aug 2026.\n//\n// WHY THIS FILE EXISTS, stated as the defect rather than as the fix.\n//\n// On 14 August an adversarial pass mutated a copy of this tree and deleted FIVE of the previous\n// night's headline fixes from cron(), one at a time. The suite stayed 25 suites / 563 assertions /\n// 0 failed / GREEN for every one of them:\n//\n// * `noPhone: !contact.phone` deleted from BOTH Facts sites — 0 occurrences of noPhone left in the\n// compiled JS, and the spin that fix exists to stop was back: an SMS step coming due for a\n// phoneless contact, forever, uncapped.\n// * `optOutRequested: reply.optOutRequested` deleted — opt-outs never detected in production.\n// * `await honourOptOut(...)` deleted — the DND write never happens, ever, for anybody.\n// * the `onDeliveryStatus(...)` call deleted — delivery never reconciled, so GHL's \"queued\" goes on\n// being recorded as \"delivered\" at the measured 7.3% undelivered rate.\n//\n// The helpers in reachability.ts are tested thoroughly — 96 assertions across reachability.test.mjs\n// and dead-letter.test.mjs. What was tested by NOTHING was the wiring from cron() into them. Every\n// one of those fixes could have been silently un-shipped by a future refactor and this wall would\n// have stayed green, which is this project's own standing lesson (\"a test that doesn't run in the\n// suite doesn't exist\") in a new form: a helper nothing calls is a test that doesn't run.\n//\n// SO THESE TESTS DRIVE THE REAL EXPORTED cron() — the val.town entry point itself, out of build/ —\n// with the network, the clock and the blob store replaced, and assert on WHAT CAME OUT: which HTTP\n// calls were made, and what was written to the blobs. No test in this file asserts on source text;\n// a structural grep is exactly what the deletions above walked straight past.\n//\n// EACH TEST WAS PROVED TO GO RED. Every call site named above was deleted in a scratch copy of the\n// tree, the copy rebuilt, and this suite run against it. The red proof is in the handover report;\n// the pairing is written next to each test as \"RED IF: ...\".\n//\n// THE THREE FAKES.\n// fetch — a router that records every request. Nothing in this file can reach the real GHL.\n// clock — Date pinned to Tuesday 11 Aug 2026, 10:00 America/New_York. Not decoration: the send\n// window is 09:00-19:00 business-local, so on a real clock \"no SMS was sent\" would pass\n// for the wrong reason every night and every Sunday, which is a test that lies twice a day.\n// blob — cron() does `await import(\"https://esm.town/v/std/blob\")`, which Node cannot resolve at\n// all. A module-resolution hook redirects that one specifier to an in-memory store. This\n// is the reason nobody had integration-tested cron() before; it is about twenty lines.\nimport { register } from \"node:module\";\nimport { readFileSync } from \"node:fs\";\nimport { suite, ok, eq, scoped, codeOnly, liveAssertions } from \"./_harness.mjs\";\n\nconst { at, t, done, header } = suite(\"wiring\");\n\n// ---- fake 1: the blob store, injected by redirecting the esm.town specifier ------------------------\nconst FAKE_BLOB = \"data:text/javascript,\" + encodeURIComponent(`\nconst store = () => (globalThis.__WIRING_BLOB__ ??= new Map());\nexport const blob = {\n getJSON: async (k) => { const s = store(); if (!s.has(k)) throw new Error(\"no such blob: \" + k); return s.get(k); },\n setJSON: async (k, v) => { store().set(k, JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(v))); },\n};\n`);\nregister(\"data:text/javascript,\" + encodeURIComponent(`\nconst FAKE = ${JSON.stringify(FAKE_BLOB)};\nexport async function resolve(spec, ctx, next) {\n if (spec === \"https://esm.town/v/std/blob\") return { url: FAKE, shortCircuit: true };\n return next(spec, ctx);\n}\n`));\n\n// ---- fake 2: the clock -----------------------------------------------------------------------------\nconst RealDate = globalThis.Date;\nconst NOW = RealDate.parse(\"2026-08-11T14:00:00.000Z\"); // Tuesday, 10:00 America/New_York\nclass FixedDate extends RealDate {\n constructor(...a) { if (a.length === 0) super(NOW); else super(...a); }\n static now() { return NOW; }\n}\nconst HOUR = 3600000;\nconst DAY = 24 * HOUR;\nconst ago = (ms) => new RealDate(NOW - ms).toISOString();\n\n// ---- fake 3: fetch ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nconst GHL = \"https://services.leadconnectorhq.com\";\nconst reply = (json, status = 200) => ({\n ok: status >= 200 && status < 300,\n status,\n json: async () => json,\n text: async () => JSON.stringify(json),\n});\n\n/** Routes are tried in order; the first match wins, so a test's own routes override the defaults. */\nfunction makeFetch(routes) {\n const calls = [];\n const fn = async (url, init = {}) => {\n const method = String(init.method ?? \"GET\").toUpperCase();\n const u = String(url);\n let body = null;\n try { body = init.body ? JSON.parse(init.body) : null; } catch { body = init.body; }\n const rec = { method, url: u, path: u.split(\"?\")[0].replace(GHL, \"\"), body };\n calls.push(rec);\n for (const r of routes) {\n if (r.method && r.method !== method) continue;\n if (!r.match.test(u)) continue;\n return reply(typeof r.reply === \"function\" ? r.reply(rec) : r.reply);\n }\n return reply({});\n };\n fn.calls = calls;\n fn.of = (method, re) => calls.filter((c) => c.method === method && re.test(c.url));\n return fn;\n}\n\nconst DEFAULT_ROUTES = [\n { method: \"GET\", match: /\\/calendars\\/events/, reply: { events: [] } },\n { method: \"GET\", match: /\\/contacts\\/\\?locationId=/, reply: { contacts: [] } }, // the dry tagging scan\n { method: \"POST\", match: /\\/contacts\\/search$/, reply: { contacts: [], total: 0 } },\n { method: \"GET\", match: /\\/opportunities\\/search/, reply: { opportunities: [] } },\n { method: \"GET\", match: /\\/conversations\\/search/, reply: { conversations: [] } },\n { method: \"GET\", match: /\\/conversations\\/[^/]+\\/messages/, reply: { messages: { messages: [] } } },\n { method: \"POST\", match: /\\/conversations\\/messages$/, reply: { messageId: \"sent-msg-1\" } },\n];\n\n// GHL_TOKEN must be in the environment BEFORE the engine module is evaluated: it reads it once, at\n// module load, into a module-level `let`. So the import is dynamic and happens here, not at the top.\nprocess.env.GHL_TOKEN = \"wiring-test-token\";\nconst E = await import(\"../build/engine.js\");\nconst cron = E.default;\n\n/**\n * One run of the REAL cron(), against the three fakes. Returns everything a test could want to\n * assert on: the run's own output, every HTTP call it made, and every blob it wrote.\n */\nasync function runCron({ state = {}, journal = [], routes = [], mode = \"live\", store } = {}) {\n const blobs = store ?? new Map();\n if (state) blobs.set(\"puppy_state\", state);\n if (journal?.length) blobs.set(\"puppy_journal\", journal);\n globalThis.__WIRING_BLOB__ = blobs;\n process.env.TEST_MODE = mode === \"live\" ? \"false\" : \"true\";\n\n const fetchFake = makeFetch([...routes, ...DEFAULT_ROUTES]);\n const realFetch = globalThis.fetch;\n const realLog = console.log;\n const logs = [];\n globalThis.fetch = fetchFake;\n globalThis.Date = FixedDate;\n console.log = (...a) => logs.push(a.map(String).join(\" \"));\n let out;\n try {\n out = await cron();\n } finally {\n globalThis.fetch = realFetch;\n globalThis.Date = RealDate;\n console.log = realLog;\n }\n return {\n out,\n f: fetchFake,\n store: blobs,\n logs,\n state: blobs.get(\"puppy_state\") ?? {},\n journal: blobs.get(\"puppy_journal\") ?? [],\n summary: blobs.get(\"puppy_summary\") ?? {},\n run: blobs.get(\"puppy_run_state\") ?? {},\n smsSends: fetchFake.calls.filter((c) => c.method === \"POST\" && /\\/conversations\\/messages$/.test(c.url) && c.body?.type === \"SMS\"),\n emailSends: fetchFake.calls.filter((c) => c.method === \"POST\" && /\\/conversations\\/messages$/.test(c.url) && c.body?.type === \"Email\"),\n dndWrites: fetchFake.calls.filter((c) => c.method === \"PUT\" && /\\/contacts\\/[^/]+$/.test(c.url) && c.body?.dndSettings),\n tasks: fetchFake.calls.filter((c) => c.method === \"POST\" && /\\/tasks$/.test(c.url)),\n tags: fetchFake.calls.filter((c) => c.method === \"POST\" && /\\/tags$/.test(c.url)),\n };\n}\n\nconst contactRoute = (c) => ({ method: \"GET\", match: new RegExp(`/contacts/${c.id}$`), reply: { contact: c } });\nconst convoRoute = (contactId, convo) => ({\n method: \"GET\",\n match: new RegExp(`/conversations/search\\\\?.*contactId=${contactId}`),\n reply: { conversations: convo ? [convo] : [] },\n});\nconst messagesRoute = (convoId, messages) => ({\n method: \"GET\",\n match: new RegExp(`/conversations/${convoId}/messages`),\n reply: { messages: { messages } },\n});\n\nconst mainState = (over = {}) => ({ ...E.freshState(ago(3 * HOUR)), status: \"main\", ...over });\nconst SMS_STEP = E.MAIN_SEQUENCE.findIndex((m) => m.channel === \"sms\");\nconst rowsFor = (journal, event) => journal.filter((r) => r.event === event);\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"noPhone — THE FULL PASS. A contact with no phone number must cost zero SMS attempts.\");\n\n// RED IF: `noPhone: !contact.phone` is deleted from the Facts literal in the per-contact pass.\n// Without it channelBar cannot see the missing number, the step is sent rather than consumed, and the\n// POST below appears. That POST is the whole spin: sendSms throws, the catch used to write nothing,\n// dueAt never moved, and the same decision came back every tick, uncapped, ~24 times a day forever.\nawait at(\"W-1 an SMS step falling due for a phoneless contact produces NO SMS and consumes the step\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-nophone\", firstName: \"Dana\", email: \"dana@example.com\", phone: null, tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago((E.MAIN_SEQUENCE[SMS_STEP].offsetHours + 1) * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: SMS_STEP }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(c), convoRoute(c.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.smsSends.length, 0, \"an SMS was POSTed to a contact with no phone number — the spin is back\");\n eq(r.out.sent, 0, \"the run counted a send that could not physically have happened\");\n // and it did not merely defer: the step is CONSUMED, so the sequence carries on for this person\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastMainStepSent, SMS_STEP + 1, \"the step was deferred, not consumed — that is the spin\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].status, \"main\", \"a missing phone number should not end the whole sequence\");\n // v1.13 — a MISSING ADDRESS is journalled as skip_step_no_address, not as an opt-out. The two\n // used to share one event name, so Kim's activity page showed contacts as having opted out when\n // they had simply never given us an address. Dana has no phone; she has opted out of nothing.\n const skipped = rowsFor(r.journal, \"skip_step_no_address\");\n eq(skipped.length, 1, \"nothing was journalled: a message that silently never went out is invisible\");\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"skip_step_channel_optout\").length, 0,\n \"a missing phone number was filed as an opt-out — that misreports the customer's own choice\");\n ok(/no phone number on the record/.test(skipped[0].detail), `wrong reason: ${skipped[0].detail}`);\n return scoped(7, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// RED IF: the same deletion. With no phone AND no email, rule 1c is what ends them; without noPhone\n// the contact reads as \"email is missing, SMS is fine\" and consumes all 8 steps in silence, then\n// fires the soft_exit_21d task telling Kim the puppy path FINISHED for somebody who received nothing.\nawait at(\"W-2 a contact with neither address ends as done_unreachable, and gets no task\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-none\", firstName: \"Sam\", email: null, phone: null, tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago(2 * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: 0 }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(c), convoRoute(c.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.state[c.id].status, \"done_unreachable\", \"an uncontactable contact is still walking the sequence\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].exitReason, E.UNREACHABLE_REASON);\n eq(r.smsSends.length + r.emailSends.length, 0, \"a message was sent to a contact with no address of any kind\");\n eq(r.tasks.length, 0, \"bulk-tagging 300 of these would put 265 tasks in Kim's CRM in one run\");\n ok(E.TERMINAL_STATUSES.has(r.state[c.id].status), \"done_unreachable is not terminal, so this repeats forever\");\n return scoped(5, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// RED IF: `noPhone: !contact.phone` is deleted from the Facts literal in the PAUSED-REPLY pass.\n// That pass is a second, separate Facts site. It pins conversationCheckFailed, so nothing it does can\n// ever send — but rule 1c still runs on it, and it is the only thing that ends an uncontactable\n// paused contact instead of leaving them parked until the 14-day timeout.\nawait at(\"W-3 the paused pass has its own Facts site, and it sees the missing phone too\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-paused-none\", firstName: \"Ada\", email: null, phone: null, tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ status: \"paused_reply\", pausedForReplyAt: ago(2 * DAY), lastMainStepSent: 2 }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(c), convoRoute(c.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.state[c.id].status, \"done_unreachable\", \"the paused pass cannot see a missing phone number\");\n eq(r.smsSends.length, 0);\n return scoped(2, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"optOutRequested + honourOptOut — an UNSUBSCRIBE reply must reach the CRM as a DND write\");\n\n// RED IF EITHER: `optOutRequested: reply.optOutRequested` deleted (the contact routes to pause_reply\n// instead — paused, a task raised, no opt-out recorded, and sending RESUMES once a human answers), or\n// `await honourOptOut(...)` deleted (the hard exit still happens, but nothing is ever written to GHL,\n// so Chloe, Ava and the 165 workflows go on messaging somebody who asked us all to stop).\n// The two assertions are deliberately independent so the pair cannot both be satisfied by one of them.\nawait at(\"W-4 an inbound UNSUBSCRIBE hard-exits AND writes Email DND permanent to the live CRM\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-optout\", firstName: \"Priya\", email: \"p@example.com\", phone: \"+15551234567\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago(2 * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: 0 }) },\n routes: [\n contactRoute(c),\n convoRoute(c.id, { id: \"cv-optout\", lastMessageDirection: \"inbound\", lastMessageDate: ago(HOUR), unreadCount: 1 }),\n messagesRoute(\"cv-optout\", [{ id: \"m1\", direction: \"inbound\", body: \"UNSUBSCRIBE\" }]),\n ],\n });\n eq(r.state[c.id].status, \"done_hard_exit\", \"the opt-out was swallowed by pause_reply, which resumes sending later\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].exitReason, E.OPTOUT_REASON);\n eq(r.dndWrites.length, 1, \"no DND was written to GHL: every email footer's promise is unkept\");\n eq(r.dndWrites[0].body.dndSettings.Email.status, \"permanent\", \"the write is not the field consent.ts reads\");\n ok(/c-optout$/.test(r.dndWrites[0].url), `the DND was written to the wrong contact: ${r.dndWrites[0].url}`);\n eq(r.smsSends.length + r.emailSends.length, 0, \"a message went out on the same pass as the opt-out\");\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"hard_exit\").length, 1, \"the exit is not on Kim's activity log at all\");\n return scoped(7, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// The same wiring, from the state a replying customer is ACTUALLY in. A customer replies with a\n// question -> paused_reply -> nobody answers -> the customer replies STOP. Before this, the paused\n// pass pinned conversationCheckFailed and never set optOutRequested, so that STOP was never seen:\n// no DND write, and 14 days later they were released as done_hard_exit for the wrong reason.\nawait at(\"W-5 a PAUSED contact's later STOP is detected, exits for the right reason, and writes DND\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-paused-stop\", firstName: \"Ben\", email: \"b@example.com\", phone: \"+15550000000\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ status: \"paused_reply\", pausedForReplyAt: ago(2 * DAY), lastMainStepSent: 3 }) },\n routes: [\n contactRoute(c),\n convoRoute(c.id, { id: \"cv-ps\", lastMessageDirection: \"inbound\", lastMessageDate: ago(HOUR), unreadCount: 1 }),\n messagesRoute(\"cv-ps\", [{ id: \"m9\", direction: \"inbound\", body: \"STOP\" }]),\n ],\n });\n eq(r.state[c.id].status, \"done_hard_exit\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].exitReason, E.OPTOUT_REASON, \"released for the wrong reason: 'paused with no human response'\");\n eq(r.dndWrites.length, 1, \"the paused pass detected the STOP but never honoured it\");\n eq(r.dndWrites[0].body.dndSettings.Email.status, \"permanent\");\n return scoped(4, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"onDeliveryStatus — a 2xx from GHL means QUEUED, and 7.3% of this account's SMS never land\");\n\n// RED IF: the `onDeliveryStatus(...)` call is deleted from the per-contact pass. Note what is asserted\n// and what is not: the READ still happens without it (it rides on convoExtras inside getReplyStatus),\n// so asserting only \"the read happened\" would stay green through the deletion. The assertions that\n// matter are the EFFECTS — the counter moved, the row was journalled, the pass stopped.\nawait at(\"W-6 a message that came back undelivered is reconciled: counted, journalled, and stops the pass\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-undeliv\", firstName: \"Cal\", email: \"c@example.com\", phone: \"+15551112222\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: {\n [c.id]: mainState({\n enteredAt: ago(10 * DAY), lastMainStepSent: 1, lastSentAt: ago(30 * 60000),\n lastMessageId: \"m-old\", lastMessageChannel: \"sms\", sendFailures: 0,\n }),\n },\n routes: [\n contactRoute(c),\n convoRoute(c.id, { id: \"cv-d\", lastMessageDirection: \"outbound\", lastMessageDate: ago(30 * 60000), unreadCount: 0 }),\n messagesRoute(\"cv-d\", [{ id: \"m-old\", direction: \"outbound\", status: \"undelivered\", body: \"hi\" }]),\n ],\n });\n ok(r.f.of(\"GET\", /\\/conversations\\/cv-d\\/messages/).length >= 1, \"the message page was never read back at all\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastDeliveryStatus, \"undelivered\", \"GHL's 'queued' is still being recorded as delivered\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].sendFailures, 1, \"an undelivered message did not count against the contact\");\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"delivery_failed\").length, 1, \"the failure is nowhere on Kim's activity log\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastMessageId, null, \"the id was not cleared, so the same failure can be counted twice\");\n eq(r.out.failed, 1, \"the run did not count it as a failure\");\n eq(r.smsSends.length, 0, \"the pass carried on and sent anyway, before the backoff could apply\");\n return scoped(7, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// The other half of the same wiring: a delivery status that CANNOT be read is recorded as the literal\n// \"unknown\" and journalled as unknown. facts.ts:1-12's standing rule — a failed read is never filed\n// as \"fine\". Nothing about a healthy contact may be inferred from a read that did not happen.\nawait at(\"W-7 a delivery status that could not be read is recorded as unknown, not as success\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-unk\", firstName: \"Nia\", email: \"n@example.com\", phone: \"+15553334444\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: {\n [c.id]: mainState({\n enteredAt: ago(10 * DAY), lastMainStepSent: 1, lastSentAt: ago(30 * 60000),\n lastMessageId: \"m-gone\", lastMessageChannel: \"sms\",\n }),\n },\n routes: [\n contactRoute(c),\n convoRoute(c.id, { id: \"cv-u\", lastMessageDirection: \"outbound\", lastMessageDate: ago(30 * 60000), unreadCount: 0 }),\n messagesRoute(\"cv-u\", [{ id: \"somebody-elses-message\", direction: \"outbound\", status: \"delivered\" }]),\n ],\n });\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastDeliveryStatus, \"unknown\", \"another system's delivered status was claimed as ours\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].sendFailures ?? 0, 0, \"an unreadable status was counted as a failure\");\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"delivery_unknown\").length, 1, \"an unreadable status left no trace\");\n return scoped(3, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"RE-ENROLMENT — a dead letter Kim has fixed and re-tagged must actually come back\");\n\n// The candidate filter was `!tags.includes(TAG_ENROLLED) && !state[c.id]`, and a dead-letter entry\n// sits in state untouched (the loop `continue`s on any terminal status) until pruneState drops it at\n// 60 days. So the CRM task's own instruction — \"remove the puppy-path-v1 tag and re-tag them\" —\n// produced zero candidates. Four contacts, one run: exactly one of them may come back.\nawait at(\"W-8 a fixed and re-tagged dead letter re-enrols; a customer and a hard exit do NOT\", async () => {\n const fixed = { id: \"dl-fixed\", firstName: \"Rosa\", email: null, phone: \"+15559998888\", tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const stillBroken = { id: \"dl-broken\", firstName: \"Tom\", email: null, phone: null, tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const customer = { id: \"was-customer\", firstName: \"Lee\", email: \"l@example.com\", phone: \"+15557776666\", tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const optedOut = { id: \"was-optout\", firstName: \"Kit\", email: \"k@example.com\", phone: \"+15555554444\", tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const term = (status, extra = {}) => ({ ...E.freshState(ago(20 * DAY)), status, lastCheckedAt: ago(20 * DAY), ...extra });\n const r = await runCron({\n state: {\n [fixed.id]: term(\"done_send_failed\", { sendFailures: 3, exitReason: \"3 consecutive send failures\" }),\n [stillBroken.id]: term(\"done_unreachable\", { exitReason: E.UNREACHABLE_REASON }),\n [customer.id]: term(\"done_customer\", { exitReason: \"became a customer\" }),\n [optedOut.id]: term(\"done_hard_exit\", { exitReason: E.OPTOUT_REASON }),\n },\n routes: [\n { method: \"POST\", match: /\\/contacts\\/search$/, reply: { contacts: [fixed, stillBroken, customer, optedOut], total: 4 } },\n contactRoute(fixed), contactRoute(stillBroken), contactRoute(customer), contactRoute(optedOut),\n convoRoute(fixed.id, null),\n ],\n });\n eq(r.state[fixed.id].status, \"main\", \"Kim fixed the number and re-tagged, and nothing happened\");\n eq(r.state[fixed.id].sendFailures, 0, \"the old failure count came back with them and will dead-letter them early\");\n eq(r.state[fixed.id].lastMessageId ?? null, null, \"a stale message id survived re-enrolment\");\n eq(r.tags.filter((x) => /dl-fixed/.test(x.url)).length, 1, \"re-enrolment did not apply the puppy-path-v1 tag\");\n eq(r.out.enrolled, 1, `${r.out.enrolled} contacts enrolled; exactly one was eligible`);\n // the three that must NOT come back, each for its own reason\n eq(r.state[customer.id].status, \"done_customer\", \"a re-tag resurrected a CUSTOMER into the nurture sequence\");\n eq(r.state[optedOut.id].status, \"done_hard_exit\", \"a re-tag undid an OPT-OUT: the one thing a tag must never do\");\n eq(r.state[stillBroken.id].status, \"done_unreachable\", \"a contact with still no phone and no email was re-admitted\");\n // ...and the still-broken one must not have cost a journal row either, or this is defect 4 again\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"enroll_refused\").filter((x) => x.contactId === stillBroken.id).length, 0,\n \"the unreachable contact was re-refused, which writes an identical journal row on every run forever\");\n return scoped(9, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"ENROL REFUSALS — 39 of the last 40 rows on Kim's live page are the same sentence\");\n\n// `enroll_refused` wrote a journal row and no state entry, so the same contact was refused on every\n// run forever. At ~24-30 rows a day the 2,000-row journal cap evicts all real history in about two\n// months. TWO RUNS, because one run cannot show a repeat.\nawait at(\"W-9 a refusal is written ONCE, not on every run — terminal by state, transient by journal\", async () => {\n const cust = { id: \"r-cust\", firstName: \"Max\", email: \"m@example.com\", phone: \"+15551110000\", tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const booked = { id: \"r-booked\", firstName: \"Eve\", email: \"e@example.com\", phone: \"+15552220000\", tags: [\"nurture - puppy\"], dnd: false };\n const routes = [\n { method: \"POST\", match: /\\/contacts\\/search$/, reply: { contacts: [cust, booked], total: 2 } },\n {\n method: \"GET\",\n match: new RegExp(`pipeline_stage_id=${E.STAGE.CUSTOMER}`),\n reply: { opportunities: [{ id: \"o1\", contactId: cust.id, pipelineId: E.MAIN_PIPELINE_ID, pipelineStageId: E.STAGE.CUSTOMER, monetaryValue: 0, status: \"open\" }] },\n },\n {\n method: \"GET\",\n match: /\\/calendars\\/events/,\n reply: { events: [{ id: \"ev1\", contactId: booked.id, startTime: new RealDate(NOW + 2 * DAY).toISOString(), endTime: new RealDate(NOW + 2 * DAY + HOUR).toISOString(), appointmentStatus: \"confirmed\" }] },\n },\n contactRoute(cust), contactRoute(booked),\n ];\n const store = new Map();\n const r1 = await runCron({ state: {}, routes, store });\n eq(rowsFor(r1.journal, \"enroll_refused\").length, 2, \"the two refusals were not recorded at all\");\n eq(r1.out.enrolled, 0, \"a customer or an already-booked lead was enrolled\");\n eq(r1.state[cust.id].status, \"done_not_enrolled\", \"the customer refusal left no state entry, so it repeats every run\");\n // NOT done_customer: api.ts:157 counts done_customer as WON, off the state. Marking somebody who\n // was ALREADY a customer before the path touched them would credit this engine with a sale it had\n // nothing to do with, on the one number the client judges the system by.\n eq(Number(r1.summary.activeByStatus?.done_customer ?? 0), 0, \"an existing customer is being counted as one this engine won\");\n eq(Number(r1.summary.customersDuringPath ?? 0), 0, \"a refusal is being counted as a conversion during the path\");\n eq(r1.state[booked.id] ?? null, null, \"a live booking is TRANSIENT and must not be barred by a state entry\");\n\n const r2 = await runCron({ state: r1.state, routes, store });\n eq(rowsFor(r2.journal, \"enroll_refused\").length, 2, \"the second run wrote the same refusals again — this is the log-eater\");\n eq(r2.out.enrolled, 0);\n // and the transient one is still being RE-EVALUATED, not permanently barred: it is still a candidate\n ok(r2.logs.concat(r2.out.log).join(\"\\n\").includes(\"live booking already exists\"),\n \"the booked contact stopped being re-evaluated, so a cancelled booking would never let them enrol\");\n return scoped(9, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"THE VERSION KIM READS\");\n\n// api.ts renders `System version ${d.engineVersion}` on her page, and engineVersion is read off the\n// puppy_run_state blob that cron() writes at the end of every run. So the number she reads is whatever\n// out.v says — which is why it sat at 1.7.1 through v1.8, v1.9 and this build.\nawait at(\"W-10 the version Kim's page shows is the one this build actually writes\", async () => {\n const r = await runCron({ state: {}, routes: [] });\n const src = codeOnly(readFileSync(new URL(\"../engine/puppy_path_v1.1.ts\", import.meta.url), \"utf8\"));\n // cron()'s OWN literal, not buildSummary's separate `v: \"1.2\"` schema version further up the file.\n const outLiteral = src.slice(src.indexOf(\"const out: any = {\"), src.indexOf(\"const out: any = {\") + 300);\n const declared = (outLiteral.match(/\\bv:\\s*\"([\\d.]+)\"/) || [])[1];\n ok(declared, \"no version literal found in the engine source at all\");\n eq(r.run.v, declared, \"the run blob does not carry the version the source declares\");\n ok(r.run.v !== \"1.7.1\", \"the version is still 1.7.1, three builds after 1.7.1\");\n // the other half of the wire: api.ts must still read it off that blob rather than typing its own\n const api = codeOnly(readFileSync(new URL(\"../engine/api.ts\", import.meta.url), \"utf8\"));\n ok(/engineVersion:\\s*run\\?\\.v/.test(api), \"Kim's page no longer reads the version from the run blob\");\n return scoped(4, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"THE RAILS THIS FILE MUST NOT BREAK\");\n\n// A cheap end-to-end sanity check that the harness above is exercising the real engine and not a\n// hollow shell: the happy path must still send, still tag, still journal, still write the summary.\n// Without this, every assertion in this file could be satisfied by a cron() that does nothing at all.\nawait at(\"W-11 the happy path still sends, and the fakes are wired to the real engine\", async () => {\n const c = { id: \"c-happy\", firstName: \"Joy\", email: \"j@example.com\", phone: \"+15556667777\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago(2 * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: 0 }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(c), convoRoute(c.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.out.sent, 1, \"the happy path sends nothing: every 'nothing was sent' assertion above is vacuous\");\n eq(r.emailSends.length, 1, \"main step 1 is an email and it did not go out\");\n ok(/The Dogs Spot/.test(String(r.emailSends[0].body.html)), \"the rendered body is not the real copy\");\n ok(/Reply UNSUBSCRIBE/.test(String(r.emailSends[0].body.html)), \"the CAN-SPAM footer is missing from a live send\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastMainStepSent, 1, \"the step was not consumed\");\n eq(r.state[c.id].lastMessageId, \"sent-msg-1\", \"the receipt was discarded, so delivery can never be reconciled\");\n eq(rowsFor(r.journal, \"sent\").length, 1);\n ok(Number(r.summary.totalTracked) >= 1, \"the summary the dashboard reads was not written\");\n return scoped(8, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// PRACTICE MODE IS STILL PRACTICE MODE. The one guarantee that must survive every change in this\n// file: with TEST_MODE on, the senders refuse anybody except the sanctioned dummy, and no DND is\n// written to a real customer's record.\nawait at(\"W-12 practice mode touches exactly one contact and writes no DND\", async () => {\n const dummy = { id: \"ZZTEST-1\", firstName: \"ZZTEST\", email: \"aizhigitovamir@gmail.com\", phone: \"+10000000000\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n mode: \"practice\",\n state: {},\n routes: [\n { method: \"POST\", match: /\\/contacts\\/upsert$/, reply: { contact: dummy } },\n contactRoute(dummy),\n convoRoute(dummy.id, { id: \"cv-t\", lastMessageDirection: \"inbound\", lastMessageDate: ago(HOUR), unreadCount: 1 }),\n messagesRoute(\"cv-t\", [{ id: \"mt\", direction: \"inbound\", body: \"unsubscribe\" }]),\n ],\n });\n eq(r.out.testMode, true, \"practice mode did not arm\");\n eq(r.dndWrites.length, 0, \"practice mode wrote a permanent DND into the client's real CRM\");\n eq(Object.keys(r.state).length, 1, \"practice mode touched more than the one sanctioned record\");\n ok(r.state[dummy.id], \"the sanctioned dummy was not the contact it operated on\");\n return scoped(4, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"THIS SUITE'S OWN FLOOR\");\n\n// WHY A SUITE IS CARRYING ITS OWN RATCHET, which is not where ratchets live in this project.\n//\n// run-all.mjs holds FLOORS and ASSERT_FLOORS for every discovered suite, and this one has an entry\n// in neither: on its first honest run the runner printed `NOT FLOORED (1): wiring.test.mjs`, which\n// is a warning by design, not a red. tests/run-all.mjs is on the explicit do-not-touch list of BOTH\n// agents working this tree tonight — checked with the other one directly rather than assumed — so\n// the entry cannot be added by either of us and has gone upward as an unowned change.\n//\n// Which leaves this file in the exact state it was written to make impossible, one level up: an\n// unfloored suite can be hollowed out to two tests without a single number moving anywhere. The\n// twelve tests above prove that deleting a call site in cron() turns something red. Nothing proved\n// that deleting the tests themselves did.\n//\n// THE PRECEDENT IS THIS PROJECT'S OWN. run-all.mjs on taper-test.ts: \"Fixed on both ends 14 Aug: the\n// suite counts live assertions and reports them, and the floor below is real.\" Both ends. Only one\n// end is available to me, so I am building that one.\n//\n// liveAssertions() is incremented inside ok() and eq() THEMSELVES — _harness.mjs's whole point, and\n// the one count in this project a test author cannot type. Deleting or gutting any test above drops\n// it. This is defeatable in exactly one way, by editing the literal below in the same diff as the\n// deletion, where it sits as a number directly next to the thing it is lying about. That is the same\n// exposure ASSERT_FLOORS itself has, and it is the best a file can do about its own size.\n// ===================================================================================================\nheader(\"THE COPY MUST MATCH WHAT THE ENGINE WILL ACTUALLY DO — the no-email promise\");\n\n// RED IF: `noEmail:` is deleted from the renderStep() call in cron(), or `bodyIfNoEmail` is removed\n// from main-2, or the variant-picking line in renderStep goes.\n//\n// THE DEFECT THIS PINS. main-1 is an email at +0h. A contact with no email address has it CONSUMED,\n// silently — correct for the engine, since an unguarded send 4xxs and retries hourly forever. Two\n// hours later main-2 arrives by text saying \"I'll send a few honest, useful puppy emails over the\n// next few weeks\", to somebody the engine decided at +0h would never get one. It is the FIRST thing\n// they ever hear from Kim, and it is a promise the system has already privately cancelled. Trace of\n// a phone-only contact over 30 days: three texts, zero emails, and no closing message either\n// (main-8 is an email too).\n//\n// It is asserted here rather than in a copy test because reachability.test.mjs R-3 and\n// consent-guard.test.mjs CG-10 both assert, correctly, that a missing email must NOT silence the\n// SMS. Those tests are right and stay. The defect was never the send — it was the words.\nawait at(\"W-14 a contact with no email address is not texted a promise of emails\", async () => {\n const noEmail = { id: \"c-noemail\", firstName: \"Dana\", email: null, phone: \"+19125550143\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [noEmail.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago((E.MAIN_SEQUENCE[SMS_STEP].offsetHours + 1) * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: SMS_STEP }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(noEmail), convoRoute(noEmail.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.smsSends.length, 1, \"the welcome text did not go out at all, so this test proves nothing\");\n const text = String(r.smsSends[0].body?.message ?? \"\");\n ok(!/\\be-?mail/i.test(text), `the text promises email to a contact with no email address: ${text}`);\n ok(/by text/i.test(text), `the no-email variant did not render; body was: ${text}`);\n\n // The other half, and the reason this is a variant rather than a rewrite: a contact who CAN\n // receive email must still be told the emails are coming, because for them they are.\n const hasEmail = { id: \"c-hasemail\", firstName: \"Dana\", email: \"dana@example.com\", phone: \"+19125550143\", tags: [], dnd: false };\n const r2 = await runCron({\n state: { [hasEmail.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago((E.MAIN_SEQUENCE[SMS_STEP].offsetHours + 1) * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: SMS_STEP }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(hasEmail), convoRoute(hasEmail.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r2.smsSends.length, 1, \"the ordinary path stopped sending the welcome text\");\n ok(/emails/i.test(String(r2.smsSends[0].body?.message ?? \"\")), \"a contact WITH an email stopped being told the emails are coming\");\n return scoped(5, \"assertions\");\n});\n\n// RED IF: the `|| !!facts.channelBlocked?.email` arm is dropped from that same call.\n// Someone who has said no to email gets no emails either, so the promise is equally untrue to them\n// — and this arm is the one a refactor drops first, because the blank-address case is the one\n// everybody remembers.\nawait at(\"W-15 an email opt-out gets the same honest text as a missing address\", async () => {\n const c = {\n id: \"c-emailoptout\", firstName: \"Dana\", email: \"dana@example.com\", phone: \"+19125550143\", tags: [], dnd: false,\n dndSettings: { Email: { status: \"permanent\" } },\n };\n const r = await runCron({\n state: { [c.id]: mainState({ enteredAt: ago((E.MAIN_SEQUENCE[SMS_STEP].offsetHours + 1) * HOUR), lastMainStepSent: SMS_STEP }) },\n routes: [contactRoute(c), convoRoute(c.id, null)],\n });\n eq(r.smsSends.length, 1, \"the text did not go out, so this proves nothing\");\n const text = String(r.smsSends[0].body?.message ?? \"\");\n ok(!/\\be-?mail/i.test(text), `an email opt-out was still promised emails: ${text}`);\n eq(r.emailSends.length, 0, \"an email went to a contact who opted out of email\");\n return scoped(4, \"assertions\");\n});\n\nawait at(\"W-13 this suite still runs every assertion it used to (its own floor, until run-all has one)\", async () => {\n const ran = liveAssertions();\n // 69 since v1.13: W-1 gained an assertion proving a missing address is NOT filed as an opt-out.\n // 77 since the no-email promise fix: W-14 and W-15 added nine between them.\n // RAISING IT when tests are added is the point. LOWERING IT is the move this line exists to make\n // visible: if you are here because assertions were deliberately merged or removed, say so in the\n // commit, and say it next to the number.\n ok(ran >= 77, `only ${ran} assertions ran in this file; the floor is 77. A wiring test that stopped ` +\n `running is a deleted call site nobody will notice — that is the entire premise of this file.`);\n // And the twelve guarantees are still individually registered, not merged into one fat test that\n // happens to clear the count. Read off the file's own source with comments and whole-line string\n // constants stripped, so neither a `[was: ...]` note nor a decoy literal can supply the text.\n const self = codeOnly(readFileSync(new URL(\"./wiring.test.mjs\", import.meta.url), \"utf8\"));\n const registered = (self.match(/await at\\(\"W-\\d+/g) ?? []).length;\n ok(registered >= 15, `only ${registered} W-tests are registered in this file; there were 15`);\n return scoped(2, \"floors\");\n});\n\nawait done();\n\n\n=====FILE scripts/blueprint.py =====\nfrom reportlab.lib.pagesizes import A4\nfrom reportlab.lib.styles import getSampleStyleSheet, ParagraphStyle\nfrom reportlab.lib.units import mm\nfrom reportlab.lib import colors\nfrom reportlab.platypus import (SimpleDocTemplate, Paragraph, Spacer, Table, TableStyle,\n PageBreak, KeepTogether, HRFlowable)\n\nOUT = \"/mnt/user-data/outputs/CALL-BLUEPRINT-9-Aug.pdf\"\nss = getSampleStyleSheet()\nINK = colors.HexColor(\"#14171a\"); MUT = colors.HexColor(\"#5b6570\")\nACC = colors.HexColor(\"#1c5d99\"); RED = colors.HexColor(\"#b3261e\")\nGRN = colors.HexColor(\"#1a6b3c\"); BG = colors.HexColor(\"#f4f6f8\")\n\nH1 = ParagraphStyle(\"H1\", parent=ss[\"Normal\"], fontName=\"Helvetica-Bold\", fontSize=16, leading=19, textColor=INK, spaceAfter=1)\nSUB = ParagraphStyle(\"SUB\", parent=ss[\"Normal\"], fontName=\"Helvetica\", fontSize=9, leading=12, textColor=MUT, spaceAfter=9)\nS = ParagraphStyle(\"S\", parent=ss[\"Normal\"], fontName=\"Helvetica-Bold\", fontSize=11.5, leading=14, textColor=ACC, spaceBefore=11, spaceAfter=4)\nB = ParagraphStyle(\"B\", parent=ss[\"Normal\"], fontName=\"Helvetica\", fontSize=9.2, leading=12.3, textColor=INK, spaceAfter=3)\nLI = ParagraphStyle(\"LI\", parent=B, leftIndent=11, spaceAfter=2.5)\nQ = ParagraphStyle(\"Q\", parent=B, fontName=\"Helvetica-Bold\", textColor=INK, spaceBefore=5, spaceAfter=1)\nA = ParagraphStyle(\"A\", parent=B, leftIndent=11, textColor=colors.HexColor(\"#20303f\"), spaceAfter=1)\nNOTE= ParagraphStyle(\"NOTE\", parent=B, fontName=\"Helvetica-Oblique\", textColor=MUT, leftIndent=11, spaceAfter=4)\n\nst = []\ndef sec(t): st.append(Paragraph(t, S))\ndef p(t, s=B): st.append(Paragraph(t, s))\ndef bl(items, s=LI):\n for t in items: st.append(Paragraph(\"•\" + t, s))\ndef qa(q, a, note=None):\n blk=[Paragraph(q, Q), Paragraph(a, A)]\n if note: blk.append(Paragraph(note, NOTE))\n st.append(KeepTogether(blk))\nCELL = ParagraphStyle(\"CELL\", parent=ss[\"Normal\"], fontName=\"Helvetica\", fontSize=8.6, leading=11.4, textColor=INK)\nKEY = ParagraphStyle(\"KEY\", parent=CELL, fontName=\"Helvetica-Bold\")\ndef box(rows, widths, head=None):\n rows = [[Paragraph(c, KEY if i == 0 else CELL) for i, c in enumerate(r)] for r in rows]\n data = ([head] if head else []) + rows\n t = Table(data, colWidths=widths)\n style=[(\"FONT\",(0,0),(-1,-1),\"Helvetica\",8.6),(\"VALIGN\",(0,0),(-1,-1),\"TOP\"),\n (\"TEXTCOLOR\",(0,0),(-1,-1),INK),(\"BOTTOMPADDING\",(0,0),(-1,-1),4),(\"TOPPADDING\",(0,0),(-1,-1),4),\n (\"LINEBELOW\",(0,0),(-1,-2),0.4,colors.HexColor(\"#dfe4e9\")),\n (\"FONT\",(0,0),(0,-1),\"Helvetica-Bold\",8.6)]\n if head: style += [(\"FONT\",(0,0),(-1,0),\"Helvetica-Bold\",8),(\"TEXTCOLOR\",(0,0),(-1,0),MUT),\n (\"LINEBELOW\",(0,0),(-1,0),0.8,colors.HexColor(\"#b9c2cb\"))]\n t.setStyle(TableStyle(style)); st.append(t)\n\n# ============================ PAGE 1 ============================\np(\"The Dogs Spot: your blueprint for tonight\", H1)\np(\"Sunday 9 August, 20:00 to 21:00 Oxford time (3:00pm for Kim in Georgia). \"\n \"meet.google.com/kii-bcbi-ihm. Dial in (GB) +44 20 3873 3170 PIN 177 520 765 1562#.\", SUB)\n\nsec(\"The whole thing in five sentences\")\np(\"Kim Hicks owns a dog boarding and training business in Savannah, Georgia. She is paying two \"\n \"separate people. Kristian Moore has spent months building her a custom web application \"\n \"plus Chloe, the AI that answers her phone, and he is many months late. You were hired \"\n \"separately for the marketing side: ad tracking, reporting, and the automatic follow up messages. \"\n \"Tonight is Kristian's final exam, where Kim checks whether what he built actually works before \"\n \"she signs it off and takes ownership. You are in the room because you inherit Chloe and the \"\n \"GoHighLevel side the moment he signs off, so you need to see the condition of what is coming \"\n \"to you.\")\n\nsec(\"Why you specifically are on this call\")\np(\"Kim put it in writing to Kristian on 4 August: \\\"I've also engaged another developer, Amir, \"\n \"who is helping me with the ongoing GoHighLevel ecosystem, tracking, reporting, and future \"\n \"automation work. Since his work will need to integrate with the platform you've built, I'd like \"\n \"him to join the acceptance walkthrough.\\\"\")\np(\"And in her Chloe email on 7 August: \\\"Amir is included for visibility because he will be \"\n \"taking Chloe over once Kristian's handoff has been completed.\\\"\")\np(\"So your job tonight is to receive information, not to give it. You are the incoming owner \"\n \"doing a survey on a house before contracts exchange. Nobody expects you to perform.\")\n\nsec(\"The cast\")\nbox([\n [\"Kim Hicks\", \"The client. Pays you both. Sharp, thorough, writes long. Has spent this week \"\n \"documenting Kristian's failures in forensic detail. Not angry at you.\"],\n [\"Kristian Moore\", \"Moore Cre8ive. Built the app and Chloe. Under pressure. Wants sign off and \"\n \"the 30 day warranty clock started. Has asked, politely, that you touch nothing.\"],\n [\"Chloe\", \"Not a person. The AI voice agent that answers Kim's phones and books appointments. \"\n \"Built inside GoHighLevel. Becomes yours after handover.\"],\n [\"Candice\", \"Kim's new staff member, started around 2 August. The second Pup Talk calendar is for her.\"],\n], [26*mm, 148*mm])\n\nsec(\"What has actually happened since the start of August\")\nbox([\n [\"2 Aug\", \"You welcomed Candice. The Bootcamp deposit on the website was corrected from $250 to $500.\"],\n [\"4 Aug\", \"Kim tells Kristian she has hired you, and asks him five hard questions in advance so the \"\n \"walkthrough is not spent explaining. She refuses to accept the app until she has seen it \"\n \"running in her own accounts.\"],\n [\"6 Aug\", \"Kim sends you a very long message: six wording changes to the follow up messages, a \"\n \"request for tag cleanup, questions about deposits, and her answers to your question cards. \"\n \"She says the old puppy workflow has never been used and can be switched off any time.\"],\n [\"7 Aug\", \"The bad day. Four real customers call in and Chloe mishandles all four. Kim writes the \"\n \"whole thing up and sends it to Kristian, copying you, demanding seven fixes before tonight. \"\n \"Kristian replies with a long defence of what is built. They agree a freeze: you observe, \"\n \"you change nothing in the app, calendars, workflows or Chloe.\"],\n [\"7 Aug\", \"You send the Friday report at 11:46pm. One line in it is wrong.\"],\n [\"8 Aug\", \"You catch it yourself at 7:33am and correct it to her: you had read the wrong field, and \"\n \"her Facebook tracking was working all along.\"],\n [\"9 Aug\", \"Today. Facebook ad permission fixed and watched working. Corrected report rebuilt. Kim \"\n \"answers your question cards and says yes to the three that were holding up go live.\"],\n], [16*mm, 158*mm])\n\nst.append(PageBreak())\n\n# ============================ PAGE 2 ============================\np(\"What the hour will look like\", H1)\np(\"Kristian shares his screen. You share nothing. Roughly: Kristian speaks half, Kim forty percent, you ten.\", SUB)\n\nsec(\"The running order\")\nbox([\n [\"0 to 20 min\", \"Chloe retest. Kristian walks through the seven things Kim caught on Friday and \"\n \"shows they are fixed. Kim will be testing him hard. Say nothing here unless asked.\"],\n [\"20 to 40 min\", \"The app walkthrough. app.thedogsspotga.com, the 21 July build. He demonstrates \"\n \"features against the contract and the ChangeLog. This is the part you need to watch \"\n \"closely, because this is what you inherit.\"],\n [\"40 to 50 min\", \"The punch list. Anything still broken gets written down for correction and retest.\"],\n [\"50 to 60 min\", \"Handover talk. Documentation, operating guide, runbook, credentials, GitHub, \"\n \"Supabase, Railway. This is your slot. Ask your questions here.\"],\n], [22*mm, 152*mm])\n\nsec(\"The seven Chloe faults, so you understand what you are watching\")\np(\"All four calls were the same customer, George Fitzgerald, plus one first time boarder, Monique Burnett.\")\nbl([\n \"Chloe offered training program appointments to a man who just wanted his dog looked after for the day.\",\n \"Four separate times she told a caller \\\"we have assigned one of our team members to get back to you\\\" \"\n \"and no task, text or notification was ever created. Nobody was assigned. Nobody knew.\",\n \"Monique's boarding drop off was created correctly, then her pickup was created as a Pup Talk by \"\n \"mistake, and Chloe told her the stay was confirmed anyway.\",\n \"The staff review task that is supposed to fire for a first time boarder never fired.\",\n \"Chloe must not confirm a stay unless both the drop off and the pickup really exist.\",\n \"Chloe must not say a handoff happened unless it happened.\",\n \"The retry and rollback path described in his own document has to be shown working.\",\n])\np(\"Not his fault, and Kim has said so in writing: Chloe refusing a 9:30am change was a four hour minimum \"\n \"notice rule on the calendar. Kim changed it herself to fifteen minutes.\", NOTE)\n\nsec(\"What Kristian has already claimed in writing, so you can spot a change of story\")\nbl([\n \"The app is live, running the 21 July build, but still deployed in his accounts, not Kim's. \"\n \"Transfer happens after QA.\",\n \"GoHighLevel owns the booking link, the calendars, the appointments and the automations. His app is \"\n \"the customer facing portal on top of that.\",\n \"23 approved calendars, and he states none have been renamed, archived, duplicated or added.\",\n \"His app writes into GoHighLevel: contacts, appointments, opportunities, tags, notes, custom fields, \"\n \"appointment statuses and workflows. Underline that one. It is the same data your reporting reads.\",\n \"Chloe is configured directly in GoHighLevel and is separate from his app's code.\",\n])\n\nst.append(PageBreak())\n\n# ============================ PAGE 3 ============================\np(\"What they will ask you, and exactly what to say\", H1)\np(\"Every answer below is true today. You are not memorising a script, you are being handed the facts.\", SUB)\n\nsec(\"From Kristian\")\nqa(\"\\\"Have you made any changes to the account?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"No. Nothing in the application, the calendar mappings, the workflows or Chloe. My side has been \"\n \"reporting, ad tracking and the follow up messages, which sit separately.\\\"\",\n \"True. The freeze has been kept. Nothing you built touches his configuration.\")\nqa(\"\\\"What access do you have?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"Kim set me up with a private integration key so the reporting can read the account. It reads, it \"\n \"does not reconfigure anything.\\\"\")\nqa(\"\\\"What are you planning to change after handover?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"Nothing until your handover is documented and I have read it. After that I will come back to Kim \"\n \"with a plan rather than start changing things.\\\"\")\n\nsec(\"From Kim\")\nqa(\"\\\"Amir, does this affect your tracking?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"It might. What I need to know is what the app writes into the CRM and when, because my reporting \"\n \"reads the same records. That is one of my questions for tonight.\\\"\")\nqa(\"\\\"Amir, can you fix that?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"I can once it is mine. Tonight it is still Kristian's to correct, and I do not want to touch it \"\n \"while you are still testing his work, or neither of you will know what changed.\\\"\",\n \"This is the single most likely trap. Do not take on Chloe work tonight. It is not yours yet and \"\n \"fixing it would wreck the QA baseline she is trying to establish.\")\nqa(\"\\\"When will my things be done?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"Monday: the list that stopped loading, your domain lines, and the corrected numbers. Tuesday: the \"\n \"review workflows and the message overlap. The tag cleanup, the Free Training Day rebuild and your two \"\n \"calendars all sit inside the freeze, so they go the day after it lifts, and that is partly what tonight \"\n \"decides. The Pups Club unsubscribe I can do either way.\\\"\",\n \"Do not promise Wednesday for the tag cleanup or the Free Training Day rebuild. Both are workflow \"\n \"changes and both are frozen. Putting the delay on the freeze rather than on you is also just true.\")\nqa(\"\\\"What about the two calendars I asked for?\\\"\",\n \"\\\"That is a question for both of you. Creating calendars is exactly what the freeze covers, and \"\n \"Kristian has told you no calendars have been added since his reconciliation. Tell me the freeze does \"\n \"not apply to those two and they are built tomorrow.\\\"\",\n \"Getting this answered in front of both of them is one of your five goals. Half an hour of work is \"\n \"sitting behind a yes.\")\n\nsec(\"If you do not know, say one of these. Never bluff.\")\np(\"Not knowing is completely normal for the person who has not built it. Bluffing is the only thing that \"\n \"would actually damage you tonight.\")\nbl([\n \"\\\"I do not want to guess at that. Let me check it properly and come back to you today.\\\"\",\n \"\\\"That is Kristian's side until handover, so I would rather he answered it than me speculating.\\\"\",\n \"\\\"I have not looked at that yet, so I do not have an answer I would stand behind.\\\"\",\n \"\\\"Can you show me what you are seeing?\\\" — buys you a minute and usually answers the question for you.\",\n \"\\\"Let me write that down and come back to you on it.\\\" Then actually write it down.\",\n])\np(\"If a technical question goes over your head entirely: \\\"Say that back to me in terms of what the \"\n \"customer experiences, and I will tell you whether it touches my side.\\\" That is a senior move, not \"\n \"a dodge, and it works every time.\")\n\nst.append(PageBreak())\np(\"Her open list, and what the freeze blocks\", H1)\np(\"If she asks when things will be done, this is the page. Half of it is waiting on tonight.\", SUB)\nbox([\n [\"The list that stopped loading\", \"She screenshotted her contact list dying mid scroll on 6 Aug, and \"\n \"separately said her page shows times but no dates. Never reproduced. The oldest thing outstanding. \"\n \"Not frozen. Monday.\"],\n [\"The four domain lines\", \"Four DNS records for Wix so her follow up emails send from thedogsspotga.com \"\n \"instead of a shared address. They do not exist yet because no sending domain is set up in her CRM. \"\n \"Not frozen. Monday.\"],\n [\"Free Training Day pick up calendar\", \"Her words: 30 minute appointments, bookable from 3:30pm with the \"\n \"last start at 4:30 so everything finishes by 5pm, with the usual appointment workflows. Twenty minutes \"\n \"of work. FROZEN.\"],\n [\"Second Pup Talk calendar\", \"Her words: a copy of the existing one under a different name, so Candice can \"\n \"book a customer straight onto a trainer's Pup Talk and the team can tell at a glance whose call it is. \"\n \"Ten minutes of work. FROZEN.\"],\n [\"Tag cleanup\", \"Remove tags not in use and ones not attached to a real customer. She also asked to track \"\n \"when a tag is applied, which her CRM does not record, so that half needs building. FROZEN.\"],\n [\"Free Training Day workflow\", \"The one that chased four people who had already booked. She built it \"\n \"herself and is open to a rebuild, with her watching. FROZEN.\"],\n [\"Review workflows\", \"Open both and settle whether her customers are being asked for a review twice. \"\n \"Reading only, not frozen. Tuesday.\"],\n [\"Message overlap\", \"Five no sale and tips sequences plus two auto responders. Confirm nothing double \"\n \"fires. Reading only, not frozen. Tuesday.\"],\n [\"Pups Club unsubscribe\", \"Her words: a way for subscription members to unsubscribe themselves. \"\n \"Doable either way.\"],\n [\"The switch on\", \"Fifteen minutes with her watching. Tagging on, new messages on, old workflow off. \"\n \"Waiting only on her picking a moment.\"],\n], [40*mm, 134*mm])\n\nst.append(PageBreak())\n\n# ============================ PAGE 4 ============================\np(\"What you must come away with\", H1)\np(\"If you get these five, the call was a success regardless of how it goes for Kristian.\", SUB)\n\nsec(\"Your five\")\nbox([\n [\"1\", \"Say the boundary out loud. \\\"Reporting, ads, tracking and the follow up messages are mine \"\n \"and carry on. The app, the calendars, the workflows and Chloe I am not touching until your \"\n \"handover is documented.\\\" Say this early. It makes you the professional in the room.\"],\n [\"2\", \"What does the app write into the CRM, and when? He listed contacts, appointments, \"\n \"opportunities, tags, notes and custom fields. Get the timing, so his writes and mine do not \"\n \"overwrite each other.\"],\n [\"3\", \"Does the app set opportunity value or move pipeline stages? Kim asked you today whether \"\n \"reporting depends on things being marked Won. If his app touches values or stages, your answer \"\n \"to her changes. This one is worth more than it sounds.\"],\n [\"4\", \"What exactly do I receive at handover, and on what date? Documentation, operating guide, \"\n \"runbook, credential sheet, GitHub, Supabase, Railway. Ask for a date, not a stage.\"],\n [\"5\", \"Do the two calendars fall under the freeze? Ask both of them together, get one answer.\"],\n], [8*mm, 166*mm])\n\nsec(\"Do not do these\")\nbl([\n \"Do not offer to fix anything of Chloe's tonight. Not yours yet, and it destroys Kim's clean test.\",\n \"Do not pile on about his failures. Kim is doing that thoroughly and it is her job, not yours. \"\n \"You come out of this better by being the calm one. He may also be the person you have to work with \"\n \"for another month.\",\n \"Do not promise a date for anything you have not scoped. \\\"I will come back to you with a date \"\n \"tomorrow\\\" is a complete answer.\",\n \"Do not raise the access key issue on this call. That is between you and Kim, and not in front \"\n \"of an outgoing contractor.\",\n \"Do not discuss money, yours or his.\",\n])\n\nsec(\"Numbers in your pocket, if you are asked how your side is doing\")\nbox([\n [\"Ad spend\", \"$718.98 last week. Facebook $554.98, Google $164.00.\"],\n [\"Cost per lead\", \"$4.11 overall. Best campaign $4.63, worst $10.87.\"],\n [\"New inquiries\", \"175 last week, down 22 on the week before.\"],\n [\"Facebook tracking\", \"Fixed today. The permission was missing since the connection was first built. \"\n \"The page now reads spend live from Meta.\"],\n [\"Follow up system\", \"Built, tested, running in practice mode. Has never messaged a real customer. \"\n \"Fifteen minutes from live once Kim picks a moment.\"],\n [\"The honest gap\", \"Revenue and ROAS do not work yet, because payment amounts never land on the \"\n \"booking record. That is the next build.\"],\n], [30*mm, 144*mm])\n\nsec(\"Last thing\")\np(\"You have been doing this properly. This week you caught your own mistake before the client did and \"\n \"corrected it inside twelve hours, which is more than the other contractor on this call can say about \"\n \"a four month overrun. Turn up, listen, ask your five, and write things down. That is the entire job \"\n \"tonight.\")\n\nSimpleDocTemplate(OUT, pagesize=A4, leftMargin=18*mm, rightMargin=18*mm, topMargin=14*mm,\n bottomMargin=12*mm, title=\"The Dogs Spot, call blueprint, 9 August\").build(st)\nprint(\"wrote\", OUT)\n\n\n\n=====FILE scripts/build.mjs =====\n// THE BUILD. engine/*.ts -> build/*.js, so the .mjs suites can import the same code the val runs.\n//\n// This file exists because the mapping used to live in my head and in shell history. A container\n// reclaim took the shell history with it. Anything a rebuild depends on is written down here.\n//\n// WHY IT TRANSPILES RATHER THAN BUNDLES. val.town runs seventeen separate files that import each\n// other, so at runtime there is exactly ONE copy of each module. A bundle per entry point gives\n// each entry its own private copy of everything below it: fill in a story slot and the engine's\n// copy would change while the story module's copy would not, and a test comparing the two would\n// pass on a system that is actually broken. So: every engine file is transpiled one-to-one, the\n// \".ts\" in each import specifier is rewritten to \".js\", and the friendly names the tests import\n// (build/engine.js, build/taper.js, build/stories.js) are thin re-export aliases onto that graph.\n// [was: `esbuild engine/puppy_path_v1.1.ts --outfile=build/engine.js` typed by hand, per file,\n// with --bundle on some and not others. A clean rebuild from source produced a build/ that\n// could not even be imported. The committed build/ had drifted from the source it came from.]\n//\n// Usage:\n// node scripts/build.mjs # engine/ -> build/\n// node scripts/build.mjs --src A --out B # build a copy of the tree somewhere else\nimport { spawnSync } from \"node:child_process\";\nimport { mkdirSync, existsSync, readdirSync, readFileSync, writeFileSync, rmSync } from \"node:fs\";\nimport { join, dirname, resolve, basename } from \"node:path\";\nimport { fileURLToPath } from \"node:url\";\n\nconst ROOT = resolve(dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), \"..\");\n\n// Friendly name the tests import -> the engine source file behind it.\nexport const ALIASES = {\n engine: \"puppy_path_v1.1\",\n taper: \"taper-messages\",\n stories: \"kim-stories\",\n messages: \"puppy-messages\",\n};\n// Aliases that also need the source's default export forwarded.\nconst ALIAS_HAS_DEFAULT = new Set([\"engine\"]);\n\nconst arg = (flag, fallback) => {\n const i = process.argv.indexOf(flag);\n return i > -1 && process.argv[i + 1] ? process.argv[i + 1] : fallback;\n};\n\nexport function build({ src = join(ROOT, \"engine\"), out = join(ROOT, \"build\"), quiet = false } = {}) {\n const failures = [];\n if (!existsSync(src)) return [`source folder ${src} does not exist`];\n\n const sources = readdirSync(src).filter((f) => f.endsWith(\".ts\"));\n if (!sources.length) return [`no .ts files in ${src}: a build that builds nothing is not a build`];\n\n mkdirSync(out, { recursive: true });\n // Clear stale artifacts so a deleted source cannot leave a ghost module behind that tests import.\n for (const f of readdirSync(out)) if (f.endsWith(\".js\")) rmSync(join(out, f), { force: true });\n\n // 1. Transpile one-to-one. No bundling: the module graph is the point.\n const r = spawnSync(\"npx\", [\n \"--yes\", \"esbuild\",\n ...sources.map((f) => join(src, f)),\n \"--format=esm\",\n `--outdir=${out}`,\n \"--log-level=warning\",\n ], { encoding: \"utf8\" });\n if (r.status !== 0) return [`esbuild: ${(r.stderr || r.stdout || \"\").trim().slice(0, 800)}`];\n\n // 2. Rewrite import specifiers: \"./foo.ts\" -> \"./foo.js\". esbuild leaves them alone when it is\n // not bundling, and node will not resolve a .ts specifier.\n let rewritten = 0;\n for (const f of readdirSync(out).filter((x) => x.endsWith(\".js\"))) {\n const p = join(out, f);\n const before = readFileSync(p, \"utf8\");\n const after = before.replace(/(from\\s*[\"'])(\\.\\.?\\/[^\"']+?)\\.ts([\"'])/g, \"$1$2.js$3\");\n if (after !== before) { writeFileSync(p, after); rewritten++; }\n }\n\n // 3. Friendly-name aliases. Re-exports, not copies, so there is still one module underneath.\n for (const [alias, source] of Object.entries(ALIASES)) {\n if (!existsSync(join(out, `${source}.js`))) { failures.push(`alias ${alias}: ${source}.js was not built`); continue; }\n const lines = [\n `// Generated by scripts/build.mjs. Re-export, not a copy: one module underneath.`,\n `export * from \"./${source}.js\";`,\n ];\n if (ALIAS_HAS_DEFAULT.has(alias)) lines.push(`export { default } from \"./${source}.js\";`);\n writeFileSync(join(out, `${alias}.js`), lines.join(\"\\n\") + \"\\n\");\n }\n\n if (!quiet) {\n console.log(`transpiled ${sources.length} engine files -> ${out}`);\n console.log(`rewrote .ts import specifiers in ${rewritten} files`);\n console.log(`aliases: ${Object.entries(ALIASES).map(([a, s]) => `${a}.js -> ${s}.js`).join(\", \")}`);\n }\n return failures;\n}\n\nif (import.meta.url === `file://${process.argv[1]}`) {\n const failures = build({ src: arg(\"--src\", join(ROOT, \"engine\")), out: arg(\"--out\", join(ROOT, \"build\")) });\n if (failures.length) { console.log(\"\\nBUILD FAILED:\\n\" + failures.join(\"\\n\")); process.exit(1); }\n console.log(\"\\nbuild ok\");\n}\n\n\n","deleted",false,"label",[14],"1bfa6e81-74e1-4c6c-ab32-118304a4ffff",["D",1785429259053],"deletedAt","legacyEnvVars","privacy","public","httpPrivacy","description","Puppy path nurture engine v1.2 — The Dogs Spot","imageUrl","userId","d26e64e6-cd39-4be1-b5b4-1de11cc555f8","pinnedFileId","ad633fec-8e73-11f1-b800-1607ee4eb77e","pinPreview","pinMigrated","screenshotVersion","likeCount",0,"orgId","019f56fd-bd59-724f-8163-80ffcf8235dd","tursoName","1bfa6e8174e14c6cab32118304a4ffff","tursoHostname","1bfa6e8174e14c6cab32118304a4ffff-val-town.aws-us-east-2.turso.io","tursoMeasuredAt",["D",1789519842404],"pinned","userPerm","r","valPerm","blobPerm","rw","emailPerm","sqlitePerm","projectPerm","telemetryPerm","user",{"_9":10,"_106":102},"org",{"_9":10,"_99":100,"_101":102,"_55":56,"_103":104,"_105":42},"branch",{"_36":89,"_11":90,"_23":29,"_91":45,"_92":-5,"_93":-5,"_94":-5,"_95":-5,"_96":-5,"_97":12,"_98":10},"isOwned",1233,"main","projectId","forkedBranchId","forkedBranchVersion","forkedProjectPrivacy","forkedProjectId","forkedProjectOrgId","projectName","userHandle","displayName","Amir","avatar","https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/ACg8ocILk3bwhcvrzozUWm7gxlKoBm7ZGtsgIkesW3ysOOsJ1rSQuA=s96-c","tier","free","canRestrictVals","profileImageUrl","ctx",{"_82":-5,"_140":141,"_142":143,"_144":145,"_146":42,"_147":42,"_148":42,"_149":33,"_150":-5,"_151":-7,"_152":-7,"_153":63,"_154":42,"_155":42,"_156":-5,"_157":42,"_158":42,"_159":42,"_160":-5},"ENV",{"_111":112,"_113":114,"_115":90,"_116":117,"_118":119,"_120":121,"_122":123,"_124":125,"_126":127,"_128":129,"_130":131,"_132":133,"_134":135,"_136":137,"_138":139},"REACT_APP_SENTRY_DSN","https://586020d86f05489db63a554690acf1e9@o1398359.ingest.sentry.io/6724499","RENDER_GIT_COMMIT","e87eb04e707cf64e7e532c8e8ec395f209e17f15","RENDER_GIT_BRANCH","POSTHOG_API_TOKEN","phc_nmoyuAkStEZuUp69rYlg1DZgrIt19Gx0Y4Hwf8tGgJP","POSTHOG_API_HOST","https://wart.val.town","WEB_API_TEMPLATE","https://{val}.web.val.run","APP_URL","https://www.val.town","MODULE_URL","https://esm.town","VANITY_WEB_API_TEMPLATE","https://{label}.val.run/","DENOLS_URL","https://lsp.val.town","NODE_ENV","production","CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY","0x4AAAAAACtaIZJH7s9rBMZ6","GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID","875989696899-jtsqkhlbdv5jrlsk8631p7ipjg3c6o62.apps.googleusercontent.com","STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY","pk_live_51N2zvWEpZTTLipIkVEwXrUG9AT0yeOOEYxszarZT1jpsZV58Ly6wlg3SltZpHN26CUalOBmUSY7adQRQiSkCZz2500qSXNkf8Y","API_URL","https://api.val.town","orgs",[],"preferencesKeybindings","default","preferencesTheme","light","preferencesFixers","preferencesCopilot","preferencesSelectionAi","preferencesCloseBrackets","preferencesChatPanelState","preferencesDprint","preferencesDenofmt","notificationCount","flagDenols","isBusinessOrgMember","businessOrgHandle","isBusinessOrgAdmin","isHigherTownieTier","navCollapsed","currentOrgId"]