[{"_1":2,"_3":-5,"_4":-5},"loaderData",{"_5":6,"_7":8},"actionData","errors","root",{"_107":108,"_109":110},"routes/embed.x.$handle.$name.$",{"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22},"handle","amir5","name","dogsspot_puppy_path","path","SOURCE-BUNDLE.part18.txt","project",{"_23":45,"_11":12,"_34":46,"_47":-5,"_48":42,"_49":50,"_51":50,"_52":53,"_54":-5,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":33,"_60":-5,"_61":-5,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":-5,"_73":74,"_75":74,"_76":77,"_78":77,"_79":77,"_80":74,"_81":74,"_82":83,"_84":85,"_86":87,"_88":42},"file",{"_23":24,"_11":14,"_25":26,"_27":-5,"_28":29,"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":17,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":-5,"_13":44},"permalink","https://www.val.town/x/amir5/dogsspot_puppy_path/code/SOURCE-BUNDLE.part18.txt","extension","txt","id","21b90c1a-1821-4c7b-873d-cc87d1641b07","fileId","d2eb3952-94f1-11f1-a59c-1607ee4eb77e","parentId","branchId","551774fb-a850-4c9d-94a1-d3509ddcf1b0","branchVersion",1186,"latest",true,"createdAt",["D",1786982915101],"version",12,"fileType","content","THE DOGS SPOT — SOURCE BUNDLE (part 18 of 47)\n\nEVERY source file in this project, engine/ included. Restoring these parts and nothing else gives\nyou a tree that builds, typechecks and runs its own test suite with no network and no val.\n\nengine/ is here as of 14 Aug 2026. It used to be left out because val 1bfa6e81-74e1-4c6c-ab32-118304a4ffff\nholds it, which was true of every engine file except engine/watch.ts: a module the val does not run,\nso it was never deployed, so it lived in one container and nothing else. A reclaim destroyed it.\nscripts/deploy.mjs --check still compares engine/ against the val file by file; that is a second\ncheck on the same files now, not the only copy of them.\n\nRESTORE (needs only node, from an empty folder). Save each part, then run this ON EACH ONE:\n\n node -e 'const fs=require(\"fs\"),p=require(\"path\");const b=fs.readFileSync(process.argv[1],\"utf8\");\n for(const s of b.split(\"\\n=====FILE \").slice(1)){const i=s.indexOf(\" =====\\n\");\n const f=s.slice(0,i),c=s.slice(i+7);fs.mkdirSync(p.dirname(f),{recursive:true});\n fs.writeFileSync(f,c.replace(/\\n$/,\"\"))}' PART.txt\n\nA record named #1, #2, ... is one FILE cut into pieces: concatenate them in order, then\nstrip one trailing newline from the last. scripts/restore.mjs does this for you.\n\nEach part is complete in itself: whole files only, no reassembly, any order.\n\nThen: node scripts/build.mjs (engine/ came out of these parts; nothing to fetch first)\n node scripts/typecheck.mjs\n node tests/run-all.mjs\n node scripts/deploy.mjs --check (pulls nothing, proves the val matches what you restored)\n node tests/negative-controls.mjs (proves the suite above can actually fail)\n\nIN THIS PART (1 of 129 files)\n\n\n================================================================================================\n=====FILE tests/dashboard.test.mjs#1 =====\n// THE DASHBOARD'S PROMISES. v2.0, 5 Aug 2026.\n// Most of this is deliberately hostile, because the page's whole claim is \"always renders something\n// true\". Every D2b case is a real defect a stranger caught, pinned so it cannot return.\nimport * as W from \"../build/worklog.js\";\nimport * as DASH from \"../build/dashboard.js\";\nimport * as H from \"../build/holiday-deposits.js\";\nimport * as DEC from \"../build/decisions.js\";\nimport * as API from \"../build/api.js\";\nimport { readFileSync } from \"node:fs\";\nimport { suite, ok, eq, scoped, codeOnly } from \"./_harness.mjs\";\nconst { t, done, header } = suite(\"dashboard\");\nconst MONTHS_D = [\"Jan\", \"Feb\", \"Mar\", \"Apr\", \"May\", \"Jun\", \"Jul\", \"Aug\", \"Sep\", \"Oct\", \"Nov\", \"Dec\"];\nconst prettyDate = (iso) => {\n const m = /^(\\d{4})-(\\d{2})-(\\d{2})/.exec(iso || \"\");\n return m ? `${MONTHS_D[Number(m[2]) - 1] ?? m[2]} ${Number(m[3])}` : iso;\n};\n// EVERY structural assertion below reads `src`, and `src` is the file with its comments removed.\n// A `[was: ...]` note that names the old call is not evidence that the old call is gone.\n// [was: the raw file. On 5 Aug the check `observedCadenceMin(wd?.history)` passed on a comment\n// explaining why that call had been removed. The green was real; the guarantee was not.]\nconst rawSrc = readFileSync(new URL(\"../engine/dashboard.ts\", import.meta.url), \"utf8\");\nconst src = codeOnly(rawSrc);\nconst rawApiSrc = readFileSync(new URL(\"../engine/api.ts\", import.meta.url), \"utf8\");\nconst apiSrc = codeOnly(rawApiSrc);\n\nheader(\"THE HOLIDAY DEPOSIT CARD\");\n\n// A real-shaped blob. Every string in it is what the collector actually produces.\nconst DEPBLOB = {\n // RELATIVE TO NOW, deliberately. [was: a hardcoded timestamp, which the stale-list banner\n // (fires past 36 hours of real elapsed time) would have turned red on 8 August with no code\n // change at all — the entire regression net going permanently RED on the wall clock.]\n at: new Date(Date.now() - 60_000).toISOString(), season: 2026,\n windows: [{ name: \"Thanksgiving\", from: \"2026-11-23\", to: \"2026-11-29\" },\n { name: \"Christmas and New Year\", from: \"2026-12-20\", to: \"2027-01-02\" }],\n rows: [\n { contactId: \"a\", name: \"Jeffrey Musselwhite\", day: \"2026-11-25\", until: \"2026-11-28\", dogs: [\"Achilles\", \"Ghost\"], dogCount: 2, window: \"Thanksgiving\",\n state: \"seen\", amountSeen: 100, note: \"A card payment for exactly $100.00 is on file on Oct 5, which is the deposit for 2 dogs.\" },\n { contactId: \"b\", name: \"Ann Flu\", day: \"2027-01-01\", until: \"2027-01-01\", dogs: [\"Fluffy\"], dogCount: 1, window: \"Christmas and New Year\",\n state: \"none_seen\", amountSeen: 0, note: \"The deposit on this stay is $50.00 (1 dog at $50) and no card payment is on file around it at all. A deposit paid by Venmo, Zelle, cheque or cash does not reach the card system, so it will not show here.\" },\n { contactId: \"c\", name: \"Reid Fail\", day: \"2026-11-24\", until: \"2026-11-24\", dogs: [], dogCount: 1, window: \"Thanksgiving\",\n state: \"could_not_check\", amountSeen: 0, note: \"We could not read this person's payments just now, so this one is unknown. It is not a finding either way.\" },\n ],\n // GENERATED, not typed. [was: a hardcoded sentence carrying pre-round-6 copy, so D5.4's\n // Venmo/Zelle assertion was satisfied by the fixture rather than by anything the code produces.]\n sentence: H.depositSentence([{ state: \"seen\" }, { state: \"none_seen\" }, { state: \"could_not_check\" }], false),\n feedDead: false, readFailures: 1, calendarsRead: 2, calendarsAsked: 2, pickupsRead: 2, pickupsAsked: 2,\n};\nconst noAgo = () => \"just now\";\n\nt(\"D5.1 a failed read of the list is a reading problem, never a finding about a customer\", () => {\n const h = DASH.depositCard(null, false, noAgo);\n ok(/could not read/i.test(h), \"a failed read does not say so\");\n ok(!/holiday stays are booked|worth checking/i.test(h), \"a failed read produced a list anyway\");\n ok(!/\\bunpaid\\b|owes|has not paid/i.test(h));\n return scoped(3, \"guarantees\");\n});\n\nt(\"D5.2 nothing collected yet says exactly that, and does not read as nobody has paid\", () => {\n const h = DASH.depositCard(null, true, noAgo);\n // [was: /Nothing collected yet/. Under a heading that reads \"Holiday deposits\", the words\n // \"Nothing collected yet\" are a sentence about MONEY — you have taken no deposits — when the\n // fact being reported is about the report: it has not run. Same three words, opposite meaning,\n // and the wrong one is the reassuring-looking zero this whole card exists not to print.]\n ok(/has not run yet/i.test(h), \"the empty state does not say plainly that the check has not run\");\n ok(!/collected/i.test(h), \"the empty state still reads as a statement about money taken\");\n ok(!/\\bunpaid\\b|owes|has not paid|0 holiday/i.test(h));\n return scoped(3, \"guarantees\");\n});\n\nt(\"D5.3 the jobs to do come first and the settled ones last\", () => {\n const h = DASH.depositCard(DEPBLOB, true, noAgo);\n const i = (s) => h.indexOf(s);\n ok(i(\"Ann Flu\") < i(\"Reid Fail\"), \"an unknown row outranks a stay actually worth checking\");\n ok(i(\"Reid Fail\") < i(\"Jeffrey Musselwhite\"), \"a settled row is above one that could not be checked\");\n return scoped(3, \"rows\");\n});\n\nt(\"D5.4 the word unpaid, and every accusation like it, never reaches this card\", () => {\n const h = DASH.depositCard(DEPBLOB, true, noAgo);\n // WIDER THAN IT WAS. [was: /unpaid|owes|has not paid|did not pay|non-payment/, which let the\n // most natural phrasing of the forbidden thing straight through: relabelling a row \"Not paid\"\n // shipped with every suite green.]\n // AND WIDER AGAIN, for the COLLECTIVE form. [was: every alternative named a single person. The\n // natural way to write the forbidden claim about a group names nobody at all: \"Nobody below has\n // paid a deposit.\" That went through untouched, and the dead-feed branch is exactly where\n // somebody would add it, because that branch already talks about everyone at once.]\n // AND WIDER A THIRD TIME, after an adversarial pass wrote 45 accusations that walked straight\n // through version two. The pattern in the misses: this regex had a vocabulary of REFUSAL\n // (\"failed to pay\", \"never paid\") and none of ABSENCE (\"no payment has been received\") or of\n // INVOICING (\"overdue\", \"past due\", \"balance due\", \"delinquent\") — and invoicing is the register\n // somebody reaches for first when they think they are being helpful. Two misses were pure\n // inflection: `owes?` matched \"owe\"/\"owes\" but not \"owed\"/\"owing\"; `hasn.t paid` matched only\n // the third person singular, so \"they haven't paid\" and \"he hadn't paid\" both passed.\n const ACCUSATION = new RegExp([\n /\\bunpaid\\b|\\bow(?:e|es|ed|ing)\\b|\\bnot paid\\b|\\bnever paid\\b|\\b(?:has|have|had)n.t paid\\b/,\n /\\bdid ?n.t pay\\b|\\bfailed to pay\\b|\\brefus\\w* to pay\\b|\\bwon.t pay\\b|\\bdeclined to pay\\b/,\n /non-?payment|\\boutstanding\\b|\\bin arrears\\b|\\bdebt\\b|\\bdelinquent\\b|\\bover-?due\\b|\\bpast due\\b/,\n /\\bbalance due\\b|\\bamount due\\b|\\bin default\\b|\\bbehind on\\b|\\bchas(?:e|ing)\\b|\\$[\\d,.]+\\s+due\\b/,\n // The collective forms: an accusation that names nobody at all.\n /\\b(?:nobody|no-? ?one|none|not one|not a single \\w+)\\b[^.]{0,40}?\\b(?:pa(?:id|ys?)|sent|settled)\\b/,\n // The same claim as a score. \"0 of 3 have paid\" names nobody and accuses everybody.\n /\\b\\d+ of (?:the |your )?\\d+\\b[^.]{0,40}?\\b(?:pa(?:id|ys?)|sent|settled)\\b/,\n // And absence-of-money phrased as a finding rather than as a limit of what we can see.\n /\\bno (?:payment|money|deposit|funds?)\\b[^.]{0,30}?\\b(?:received|come in|arrived)\\b/,\n ].map((r) => r.source).join(\"|\"), \"i\");\n // The only sentences allowed to use this language are the ones that DENY the accusation. They\n // are removed by exact text before scanning, and each is asserted PRESENT, so neither can be\n // quietly deleted to make room for a real one — a scrub whose target has vanished is a scrub\n // that protects nothing while still reading as a safeguard.\n const DISCLAIMER = \"This is a shortlist to look at rather than a list of people who owe you.\";\n const FEED_DENIAL = \"rather than that nobody has paid\";\n const DENIALS = [DISCLAIMER, FEED_DENIAL];\n // NORMALISED BEFORE ANY OF IT IS APPLIED. Round 15 got \"Jeffrey has not\\u00A0paid his deposit.\"\n // past the whole regex with ONE non-breaking space: a JS regex literal space matches U+0020 and\n // nothing else, so a single invisible character defeated every two-word and three-word\n // alternative at once — not paid, past due, balance due, amount due, in default, behind on, the\n // contraction forms. Ten of roughly twenty-five alternatives, invisibly, and it renders\n // identically to a space on Kim's phone. Non-breaking and zero-width characters are folded to\n // ordinary spaces and runs of whitespace collapsed, so the regex sees the sentence a reader sees.\n const flatten = (x) => String(x).replace(/[\\u00A0\\u2007\\u202F\\u2000-\\u200B\\uFEFF]/g, \" \").replace(/\\s+/g, \" \");\n const scrub = (x) => DENIALS.reduce((s, d) => s.split(d).join(\" \"), flatten(x));\n ok(h.includes(DISCLAIMER), \"the card dropped the sentence that says this is not a list of people who owe her money\");\n const deadSentence = H.depositSentence([{ state: \"none_seen\" }, { state: \"none_seen\" }], true);\n ok(deadSentence.includes(FEED_DENIAL), `the dead-feed sentence no longer denies the accusation, so scrubbing it guards nothing: ${deadSentence}`);\n ok(!ACCUSATION.test(scrub(h)), \"the card accuses somebody of not paying\");\n // AND ON GENERATED NOTES, not the hand-typed fixture ones. [was: DEPBLOB's notes are typed\n // strings, so this scanned my own prose rather than anything the code produces. Appending\n // \", so they still owe this one.\" to the already-counted branch reached Kim with the suite\n // green, despite \"owes?\" being in the ban.]\n const st = (day) => ({ contactId: \"c\", day, until: day, dogs: [\"R\"], dogCount: 1, bookedAt: \"2026-11-01 09:00:00\", window: \"W\" });\n const generated = [\n ...H.statusesForCustomer([st(\"2026-11-25\"), st(\"2026-12-22\")], [{ amount: 50, id: \"a\", at: \"2026-11-20T00:00:00Z\", kind: \"direct\" }]),\n H.statusFor(st(\"2026-11-25\"), null),\n H.statusFor(st(\"2026-11-25\"), []),\n H.statusFor(st(\"2026-11-25\"), [{ amount: 355, id: \"b\", at: \"2026-11-20T00:00:00Z\", kind: \"direct\" }]),\n H.statusFor({ ...st(\"2026-11-25\"), bookedAt: null }, []),\n ];\n ok(generated.length >= 5, \"no notes were generated, so this check inspected nothing\");\n for (const g of generated) {\n ok(!ACCUSATION.test(scrub(g.note)), `a generated note accuses somebody: ${g.note}`);\n const card = DASH.depositCard({ ...DEPBLOB, rows: [{ ...DEPBLOB.rows[0], state: g.state, note: g.note }] }, true, noAgo);\n ok(!ACCUSATION.test(scrub(card)), `a generated note accuses somebody once rendered: ${g.note}`);\n }\n\n // AND ACROSS THE CARD'S CONDITIONAL STRINGS, which a single healthy fixture never renders.\n // [was: every card scanned here was a spread of DEPBLOB, which hardcodes 2/2 calendars, 2/2\n // pick-ups, feedDead:false and a name that is not a test record. So FOUR strings were never\n // examined at all — the missed-calendar banner, the pick-up banner, the test-record warning and\n // the dead-feed sentence — and the banned words themselves went through them: \"those deposits\n // are unpaid\", \"those deposits are outstanding\", \"This one has not paid\", \"Nobody below has\n // paid a deposit\". Every combination is rendered now.]\n const testRow = { ...DEPBLOB.rows[0], name: \"help test\", state: \"none_seen\", note: H.statusFor(st(\"2026-11-25\"), []).note };\n const shapes = [];\n for (const calendars of [[2, 2], [1, 2], [0, 2]]) {\n for (const pickups of [[2, 2], [1, 2]]) {\n for (const feedDead of [false, true]) {\n for (const readFailures of [0, 2]) {\n for (const rows of [[testRow], [{ ...testRow, state: \"could_not_check\" }], DEPBLOB.rows, []]) {\n for (const ageMs of [60_000, 5 * 86_400_000]) {\n shapes.push({\n ...DEPBLOB, rows, feedDead, readFailures,\n calendarsRead: calendars[0], calendarsAsked: calendars[1],\n pickupsRead: pickups[0], pickupsAsked: pickups[1],\n at: new Date(Date.now() - ageMs).toISOString(),\n sentence: H.depositSentence(rows.map((r) => ({ state: r.state })), feedDead),\n });\n }\n }\n }\n }\n }\n }\n ok(shapes.length >= 100, `only ${shapes.length} card shapes were built, so this is not a sweep`);\n let renderedDeadFeed = 0;\n for (const shape of shapes) {\n const card = DASH.depositCard(shape, true, (x) => (Date.now() - Date.parse(x) > 86_400_000 ? \"5 days ago\" : \"just now\"));\n if (card.includes(FEED_DENIAL)) renderedDeadFeed++;\n ok(!ACCUSATION.test(scrub(card)),\n `a card accuses somebody: calendars ${shape.calendarsRead}/${shape.calendarsAsked}, pick-ups ${shape.pickupsRead}/${shape.pickupsAsked}, feedDead ${shape.feedDead}, ${shape.rows.length} rows`);\n }\n // The sweep must actually REACH the dead-feed sentence. Building 192 shapes proves nothing about\n // a branch none of them render, and this is the branch the whole widening above is aimed at.\n ok(renderedDeadFeed > 0, \"no card in the sweep rendered the dead-feed sentence, so that branch went unscanned\");\n // And the two states the card can be in besides \"here is a list\".\n for (const card of [DASH.depositCard(null, false, noAgo), DASH.depositCard(null, true, noAgo)]) {\n ok(!ACCUSATION.test(scrub(card)), \"the empty or unreadable card accuses somebody\");\n }\n ok(/Venmo, Zelle or a cheque/i.test(h), \"the card does not say a deposit may have been paid another way\");\n return scoped(shapes.length + generated.length * 2 + 7, \"rendered cards\");\n});\nt(\"D5.5 a customer whose payments could not be read is shown as unknown, not as nothing found\", () => {\n const h = DASH.depositCard(DEPBLOB, true, noAgo);\n ok(/Could not check/.test(h), \"an unreadable customer is not labelled as such\");\n ok(/could not be checked when this ran/i.test(h), \"the count of unknown rows is not stated\");\n return scoped(2, \"guarantees\");\n});\n\nt(\"D5.6 a calendar that did not answer is declared, so the list is not read as complete\", () => {\n const partial = { ...DEPBLOB, calendarsRead: 1, calendarsAsked: 2 };\n ok(/Not the whole picture/.test(DASH.depositCard(partial, true, noAgo)));\n ok(!/Not the whole picture/.test(DASH.depositCard(DEPBLOB, true, noAgo)), \"the warning shows when nothing is missing\");\n return scoped(2, \"cases\");\n});\n\nt(\"D5.7 a customer's name is escaped before it reaches the page\", () => {\n const nasty = { ...DEPBLOB, rows: [{ ...DEPBLOB.rows[0], name: '', note: \"hi\" }] };\n const h = DASH.depositCard(nasty, true, noAgo);\n ok(!/